Concurrent adjuvant radiochemotherapy versus standard chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy in operable breast cancer after breast conserving therapy: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND

To compare the efficacy of concurrent and sequential administration of radiotherapy and chemotherapy on patients with operable breast cancer after breast.conserving surgery. (BCS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched MEDLINE (National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland) and EMBASE (Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands) databases for eligible studies. Clinical outcomes (such as overall and locoregional recurrence-free survival, toxicity related complications) used as evaluation indexes of efficacy. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) of each index was calculated and analyzed with the RevMan Version 5.2 software.

RESULTS

Three articles (two trials), which compared the clinical efficacy of concurrent and sequential administration of radiotherapy and chemotherapy for operable breast cancer patients, were eligible in this meta-analysis. There were significant differences between concurrent and sequential treatments in 5-year loco-regional recurrence free survival (OR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.20-0.75, P = 0.005) and late skin toxicity of telangiectasia (OR: 2.00, 95% CI: 1.39-2.87, P = 0.0002). However, no significant difference was discovered in five-year overall survival (OR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.35-1.11, P > 0.05), acute skin toxicity (OR: 1.73, 95% CI: 0.98-3.04, P > 0.05) and late skin toxicity of lymphedema (OR: 1.27, 95% CI: 0.88-1.83, P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that the concurrent administration of chemotherapy (anthracycline-based) and radiotherapy was superior to the sequential administration in locoregional recurrence-free survival for the operable node positive breast cancer patients. However, choose of treatment for operable breast cancer patients must be cautious due to high risk of lymphedema.