• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公共部门三种常见减肥手术的结果。

Outcome of three common bariatric procedures in the public sector.

作者信息

Clough Anthony, Hamill Daniel, Jackson Shane, Remilton Michael, Eyre Rosemarie, Callahan Rosie

机构信息

Eastern Health Network, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

ANZ J Surg. 2017 Nov;87(11):930-934. doi: 10.1111/ans.13585. Epub 2016 Apr 12.

DOI:10.1111/ans.13585
PMID:27072289
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In Australia, over 90% of bariatric surgery is performed in the private sector by paying patients with health insurance. The demand for government funded services is overwhelming and data are needed on the efficiency, safety and effectiveness of the current range of bariatric procedures in a public hospital setting. The aim of this study was to document medium term outcomes of gastric banding (laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB)), gastric bypass (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB)) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) in a publicly funded programme.

METHODS

Primary cases with minimum 18 months' follow up were included. Hospital usage, complications, weight loss and co-morbidity outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 229 patients (125 LAGB, 42 RYGB, 62 SG) were included. Mean weight (body mass index) for LAGB, RYGB and SG was 130.6 (46.3), 137.2 (50.5) and 162.7 (55.2) kg (kg/m ), respectively (P < 0.001). Operative time and hospital stay were longest for RYGB and intensive care stay was longest for SG. Major complications occurred at 0.0%, 11.9% and 12.9% (P < 0.001) and major reoperations occurred over 5 years 11.2%, 21.4% and 6.5% (P = 0.064). Mean (standard deviation) excess weight loss was 29.9% (33.1), 75.7% (31.8) and 52.7% (19.7) with mean follow up of 3.6 years and 79.0% complete data.

CONCLUSIONS

In our public bariatric programme, LAGB patients perform relatively poorly. An increased focus on SG may be appropriate as weight loss is more reliable, major reoperation rates are low and follow up less important. Our experience should be useful for those considering how best to structure and fund a public bariatric programme.

摘要

背景

在澳大利亚,超过90%的减肥手术是由有医疗保险的付费患者在私立机构进行的。政府资助服务的需求极为庞大,因此需要了解公立医院环境下当前一系列减肥手术的效率、安全性和有效性数据。本研究的目的是记录一项政府资助项目中胃束带术(腹腔镜可调节胃束带术(LAGB))、胃旁路术(Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(RYGB))和袖状胃切除术(SG)的中期结果。

方法

纳入至少随访18个月的初治病例。比较医院使用情况、并发症、体重减轻和合并症结果。

结果

共纳入229例患者(125例LAGB、42例RYGB、62例SG)。LAGB、RYGB和SG的平均体重(体重指数)分别为130.6(46.3)、137.2(50.5)和162.7(55.2)kg(kg/m²)(P<0.001)。RYGB的手术时间和住院时间最长,SG的重症监护时间最长。主要并发症发生率分别为0.0%、11.9%和12.9%(P<0.001),5年内主要再次手术发生率分别为11.2%、21.4%和6.5%(P=0.064)。平均(标准差)超重减轻率分别为29.9%(33.1)、75.7%(31.8)和52.7%(19.7),平均随访3.6年,完整数据率为79.0%。

结论

在我们的公共减肥项目中,LAGB患者的表现相对较差。由于SG减肥效果更可靠、主要再次手术率低且随访不太重要,因此可能应更多地关注SG。我们的经验对那些考虑如何以最佳方式构建和资助公共减肥项目的人应有所帮助。

相似文献

1
Outcome of three common bariatric procedures in the public sector.公共部门三种常见减肥手术的结果。
ANZ J Surg. 2017 Nov;87(11):930-934. doi: 10.1111/ans.13585. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
2
Gastric band conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass shows greater weight loss than conversion to sleeve gastrectomy: 5-year outcomes.胃束带转换为 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术比转换为袖状胃切除术能获得更大的减重效果:5 年随访结果。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 Oct;14(10):1531-1536. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.06.002. Epub 2018 Jun 10.
3
Comparative effectiveness of 3 bariatric surgery procedures: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, laparoscopic adjustable gastric band, and sleeve gastrectomy.三种减肥手术方法的比较效果:Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术、腹腔镜可调节胃束带术和袖状胃切除术。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016 Jun;12(5):997-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.01.020. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
4
Comparative effectiveness and safety of gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy and adjustable gastric banding in a population-based bariatric program: prospective cohort study.在一项基于人群的减肥手术项目中胃旁路术、袖状胃切除术和可调节胃束带术的比较有效性和安全性:前瞻性队列研究
Can J Surg. 2016 Aug;59(4):233-41. doi: 10.1503/cjs.013315.
5
Sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass as revisional bariatric procedures: retrospective evaluation of outcomes.袖状胃切除术或胃旁路术作为减重手术的修正术式:结局的回顾性评估
Surg Endosc. 2013 Nov;27(11):4277-83. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3038-9. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
6
Morbidity Rates and Weight Loss After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass, Sleeve Gastrectomy, and Adjustable Gastric Banding in Patients Older Than 60 Years old: Which Procedure to Choose?60岁以上患者接受Roux-en-Y胃旁路术、袖状胃切除术和可调节胃束带术后的发病率及体重减轻情况:应选择哪种手术?
Obes Surg. 2016 Apr;26(4):730-6. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1824-2.
7
Conversion of failed gastric banding into four different bariatric procedures.将失败的胃束带术改为四种不同的减重手术。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012 Jul-Aug;8(4):400-7. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2011.06.009. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
8
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass after successful weight loss with a laparoscopic adjustable gastric band: rationales and early outcomes in patients of body mass index<35 kg/m(2.).腹腔镜可调节胃束带减肥成功后行Roux-en-Y胃旁路术:体重指数<35kg/m²患者的理论依据及早期结果
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 Nov-Dec;10(6):1104-8. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.03.011. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
9
Revision Procedures After Failed Adjustable Gastric Banding: Comparison of Efficacy and Safety.可调节胃束带术失败后的修复手术:疗效与安全性比较
Obes Surg. 2017 Nov;27(11):2861-2867. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2716-4.
10
Revisional weight loss surgery after failed laparoscopic gastric banding: an institutional experience.腹腔镜胃束带术失败后的减重修正手术:机构经验
Surg Endosc. 2013 Nov;27(11):4087-93. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3065-6. Epub 2013 Jul 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Demographic Factors Associated with Postoperative Complications in Primary Bariatric Surgery: A Rapid Review.原发性减重手术术后并发症相关的人口统计学因素:快速综述
Obes Surg. 2025 Apr;35(4):1456-1468. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07784-x. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
2
Bariatric surgery: a call for greater access to coordinated surgical and specialist care in the public health system.减肥手术:呼吁在公共卫生系统中增加获得协调的手术和专科护理的机会。
Med J Aust. 2022 Sep 5;217(5):228-231. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51673. Epub 2022 Aug 14.
3
Bariatric surgery in a public hospital: a 10-year experience.
公立医院的减重手术:10 年经验。
ANZ J Surg. 2022 Sep;92(9):2129-2136. doi: 10.1111/ans.17768. Epub 2022 May 23.
4
Missing something? A scoping review of venous thromboembolic events and their associations with bariatric surgery. Refining the evidence base.遗漏了什么?关于静脉血栓栓塞事件及其与减肥手术关联的范围综述。完善证据基础。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Aug 17;59:264-273. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.08.014. eCollection 2020 Nov.
5
Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for obesity.腹腔镜可调节胃束带术与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术治疗肥胖症效果的Meta分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Mar;98(9):e14735. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014735.
6
Which Bariatric Procedure Is the Most Popular in the World? A Bibliometric Comparison.世界上最受欢迎的减肥手术是哪种?文献计量学比较。
Obes Surg. 2018 Aug;28(8):2339-2352. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3163-6.
7
The knowledge of Polish primary care physicians about bariatric surgery.波兰初级保健医生对减肥手术的了解。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2016;11(3):164-170. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2016.62446. Epub 2016 Sep 22.