Pergialiotis Vasilios, Frountzas Maximos, Siotos Charalampos, Karampetsou Nikoleta, Perrea Despina N, Efthymios Vlachos Dimitrios
a Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research N.S. Christeas , National and Kapodistrian University of Athens , Athens , Greece and.
b 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens , Athens , Greece.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017 Feb;30(4):486-491. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2016.1176135. Epub 2016 May 5.
The pathophysiologic processes that result in wound healing are the same regardless of the tissue involved. The purpose of the present meta-analysis is to evaluate whether cesarean scar characteristics may predict the presence of pelvic adhesions.
We conducted a systematic review searching the Medline (1966-2016), Scopus (2004-2016), ClinicalTrials.gov (2008-2016), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials CENTRAL (1999-2016) and Google Scholar (2004-2016) databases together with reference lists from included studies. All prospective and retrospective observational cohort studies were included. Statistical meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.1 software.
Current evidence suggests that depressed scars are positively associated with intra-abdominal adhesions (ΟR 2.79, 95%CI 1.74-4.46). Elevated scars might also correlate with the presence of adhesions, however, this association did not reach statistical significance (OR 1.61, 95%CI 0.91-2.85, p = 0.10). The same was reported in the case of scar pigmentation (REM, OR 1.68, 95%CI 0.86-3.26, p = 0.13). Flat scars were predictive of the absence of adhesions (899 patients, REM, OR 0.33, 95%CI 0.23-0.54, p < 0.00001).
According to our meta-analysis, abdominal wound characteristics following cesarean section can predict the presence of adhesions. However, given the small number of published studies, further research is needed to corroborate our findings.
无论涉及何种组织,导致伤口愈合的病理生理过程都是相同的。本荟萃分析的目的是评估剖宫产瘢痕特征是否可预测盆腔粘连的存在。
我们进行了一项系统评价,检索了Medline(1966 - 2016年)、Scopus(2004 - 2016年)、ClinicalTrials.gov(2008 - 2016年)、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库CENTRAL(1999 - 2016年)以及Google Scholar(2004 - 2016年)数据库,并纳入了所纳入研究的参考文献列表。纳入了所有前瞻性和回顾性观察性队列研究。使用RevMan 5.1软件进行统计荟萃分析。
目前的证据表明,凹陷性瘢痕与腹腔内粘连呈正相关(比值比2.79,95%置信区间1.74 - 4.46)。隆起性瘢痕可能也与粘连的存在相关,然而,这种关联未达到统计学意义(比值比1.61,95%置信区间0.91 - 2.85,p = 0.10)。瘢痕色素沉着情况也是如此(随机效应模型,比值比1.68,95%置信区间0.86 - 3.26,p = 0.13)。平坦瘢痕可预测无粘连(899例患者,随机效应模型,比值比0.33,95%置信区间0.23 - 0.54,p < 0.00001)。
根据我们的荟萃分析,剖宫产术后腹部伤口特征可预测粘连的存在。然而,鉴于已发表的研究数量较少,需要进一步研究来证实我们的发现。