Bredenkamp Caryn, Buisman Leander R
Health, Nutrition & Population Global Practice, The World Bank, 1818 H Street, NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA
Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Sep;31(7):919-27. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czw011. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
The objective of this article is to assess the progress of the Philippines health sector in providing financial protection to the population, as measured by estimates of health insurance coverage, out-of-pocket spending, catastrophic payments and impoverishing health expenditures. Data are drawn from eight household surveys between 2000 and 2013, including two Demographic and Health Surveys, one Family Health Survey and five Family Income and Expenditure Surveys. We find that out-of-pocket spending increased by 150% (real) from 2000 to 2012, with the sharpest increases occurring in recent years. The main driver of health spending is medicines, accounting for almost two-thirds of total health spending, and as much as three-quarters among the poor. The incidence of catastrophic payments has tripled since 2000, from 2.5% to 7.7%. The percentage of people impoverished by health spending has also increased and, in 2012, out-of-pocket spending on health added 1.5 percentage points to the poverty rate, pushing more than 1.5 million people into poverty. In light of these findings, recent policies to enhance financial risk protection-such as the expansion of government-subsidized health insurance from the poor to the near-poor, a policy of zero copayments for the poor, a deepening of the benefit package and provider payment reform aimed at cost-containment-are to be commended. Indeed, between 2008 and 2013, self-reported health insurance coverage increased across all quintiles and its distribution became more pro-poor. To speed progress toward financial protection goals, quick wins could include issuing health insurance cards to the poor to increase awareness of coverage and limiting out-of-pocket spending by clearly defining a clear copayment structure for non-poor members. An in-depth analysis of the pharmaceutical sector would help to shed light on why medicines impose such a large financial burden on households.
本文的目的是评估菲律宾卫生部门在为民众提供财务保护方面取得的进展,评估指标包括医疗保险覆盖率、自付费用、灾难性支出和致贫性医疗支出的估计数。数据取自2000年至2013年期间的八项家庭调查,包括两项人口与健康调查、一项家庭健康调查和五项家庭收入与支出调查。我们发现,从2000年到2012年,自付费用实际增长了150%,近年来增长最为迅猛。医疗支出的主要驱动因素是药品,几乎占医疗总支出的三分之二,在贫困人口中占比高达四分之三。自2000年以来,灾难性支出的发生率增长了两倍,从2.5%升至7.7%。因医疗支出致贫的人口比例也有所增加,2012年,医疗自付费用使贫困率上升了1.5个百分点,超过150万人陷入贫困。鉴于这些发现,近期旨在加强财务风险保护的政策——比如将政府补贴的医疗保险从贫困人口扩大到准贫困人口、对贫困人口实行零自付政策、深化福利套餐以及旨在控制成本的医疗服务提供者支付改革——值得称赞。事实上,在2008年至2013年期间,所有五分位数人群中自我报告的医疗保险覆盖率均有所提高,且其分布变得更加有利于贫困人口。为加快实现财务保护目标,速赢举措可包括向贫困人口发放医疗保险卡以提高对保险覆盖范围的认识,以及通过明确为非贫困人口定义清晰的自付结构来限制自付费用。对制药行业进行深入分析将有助于揭示药品为何给家庭带来如此巨大的财务负担。