Verschakelen J A, Deschepper K, Clarysse I, Demedts M
Dept. of Pathophysiology, Catholic University, Leuven, Belgium.
Eur Respir J. 1989 Jan;2(1):71-7.
The accuracy of the respiratory inductive plethysmograph (Respitrace) for estimation of lung volume changes during quiet breathing and vital capacity (VC) manoeuvres was evaluated using a variant of the multiple linear regression (MLR) technique. We applied this technique successively on quiet breathing, on the whole VC, and on each of the four quarters of the VC separately. This was carried out in six body positions. The best estimation of tidal volumes was obtained when calibration factors calculated during quiet breathing were used. The best estimation of VC was obtained when the calibration factors were adapted to the level of lung inflation. These results indicate that, using a single position MLR calibration method, the Respitrace measures tidal and VC mouth volumes very accurately. The accuracy of this MLR method for estimation of the rib cage and abdominal contributions was validated by comparison with isovolume calibration factors. Both techniques gave very similar results during tidal breathing. However, the MLR calibration factors may have no physiological meaning (i.e. for volume partitioning) when they are calculated from VC manoeuvres, in which more than two degrees of freedom are involved.
采用多元线性回归(MLR)技术的一种变体,评估了呼吸感应体积描记器(Respitrace)在静息呼吸和肺活量(VC)动作期间估计肺容积变化的准确性。我们先后将该技术应用于静息呼吸、整个VC以及VC的四个阶段中的每一个阶段。这在六个身体姿势下进行。当使用静息呼吸期间计算的校准因子时,获得了对潮气量的最佳估计。当校准因子适应肺膨胀水平时,获得了对VC的最佳估计。这些结果表明,使用单位置MLR校准方法,Respitrace能够非常准确地测量潮气量和VC口腔容积。通过与等容积校准因子比较,验证了这种MLR方法估计胸廓和腹部贡献的准确性。在潮式呼吸期间,两种技术给出了非常相似的结果。然而,当从涉及两个以上自由度的VC动作计算MLR校准因子时,它们可能没有生理学意义(即对于容积分配)。