Mueller Ruediger B, Gengenbacher Michael, Richter Symi, Dudler Jean, Möller Burkhard, von Kempis Johannes
Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Rehabilitation, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, Rorschacherstr. 95, 9007, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Bethesdaspital, Gellertstrasse 144, 4052, Basel, Switzerland.
Arthritis Res Ther. 2016 Apr 14;18:88. doi: 10.1186/s13075-016-0985-2.
Vacation can present a major problem to patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with weekly subcutaneous biologics, including subcutaneous (SC) abatacept. Therefore, the replacement of four SC doses of abatacept by a single dose of intravenous (IV) abatacept may present an acceptable alternative to cover a 4-week interval needed for vacations. In the study presented, we analyzed the efficacy and safety of this intervention followed by a switch back to SC abatacept after 4 weeks.
This open-label, prospective, single-arm, 24-week trial recruited patients with established RA in low disease activity (LDA) or in remission on treatment with SC abatacept for at least 3 months to receive a single dose of IV abatacept (baseline) followed by a break of 4 weeks and then continuation of weekly SC abatacept from day 28 on. Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD)-inadequate or biologic-inadequate responders (or both) were included.
The baseline characteristics of the 49 patients (per protocol) were typical for a cohort of RA patients with established disease (mean disease duration of 8.31 years) in LDA under treatment with synthetic DMARDs and a biologic. Two patients (one flare and one patient decision) dropped out of the study. The proportions of patients with disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS-28) of not more than 3.2 at day 28 were 93.9 % (95 % confidence interval (CI) 83.5-97.9) and 93.6 % (95 % CI 82.8-97.8) at the end of the study (day 168). The average DAS-28 values were 1.74 (standard deviation (SD) ± 0.72) at baseline, 2.03 (SD ± 1.03) at day 28, and 1.96 (SD ± 0.92) at the end of the study (day 168). Pre-exposure to IV abatacept and having failed methotrexate or anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) did not influence the average DAS-28 or the proportion of patients maintaining LDA over time. The average health assessment questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI) was stable throughout the study. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 75 % of subjects. Four serious AEs were described during the study. None of them was related to the investigational product, and all serious AEs could be resolved during hospitalization.
This prospective, open-label study of abatacept shows for the first time that switching from weekly SC to IV abatacept and back after 4 weeks is an effective and safe way to bridge vacations in RA patients in LDA or remission. (NCT1846975, registered April 19, 2013.).
对于接受每周一次皮下注射生物制剂(包括皮下注射阿巴西普)治疗的类风湿关节炎(RA)患者而言,假期可能会带来一个重大问题。因此,用单剂量静脉注射阿巴西普替代四剂皮下注射阿巴西普或许是一种可接受的选择,以覆盖假期所需的4周间隔。在本研究中,我们分析了这一干预措施的疗效和安全性,4周后再换回皮下注射阿巴西普。
这项开放标签、前瞻性、单臂、24周试验招募了疾病活动度低(LDA)或处于缓解期且接受皮下注射阿巴西普治疗至少3个月的确诊RA患者,接受单剂量静脉注射阿巴西普(基线),随后休息4周,然后从第28天起继续每周皮下注射阿巴西普。纳入病情改善抗风湿药物(DMARD)治疗反应不佳或生物制剂治疗反应不佳(或两者皆不佳)的患者。
49例(符合方案)患者的基线特征对于一组接受合成DMARD和生物制剂治疗的确诊RA患者(平均病程8.31年)处于LDA状态而言具有典型性。两名患者(一名病情复发和一名患者自行决定)退出研究。在第28天时疾病活动度评分在28个关节(DAS-28)不超过3.2的患者比例在研究结束时(第168天)为93.9%(95%置信区间(CI)83.5-97.9)和93.6%(95%CI 82.8-97.8)。DAS-28的平均数值在基线时为1.74(标准差(SD)±0.72),在第28天时为2.03(SD±1.03),在研究结束时(第168天)为1.96(SD±0.92)。预先接触静脉注射阿巴西普以及甲氨蝶呤或抗肿瘤坏死因子(抗TNF)治疗失败并不影响DAS-28的平均值或随时间维持LDA状态的患者比例。在整个研究过程中,平均健康评估问卷残疾指数(HAQ-DI)保持稳定。75%的受试者发生了不良事件(AE)。在研究期间描述了4起严重AE。它们均与研究产品无关,且所有严重AE在住院期间均可得到解决。
这项关于阿巴西普的前瞻性、开放标签研究首次表明,从每周皮下注射改为静脉注射阿巴西普并在4周后再换回是一种在LDA或缓解期的RA患者中度过假期的有效且安全的方法。(NCT1846975,于2013年4月19日注册。)