• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基因组测序的偶然发现:对个性化医疗的阻碍?

Incidentalome from Genomic Sequencing: A Barrier to Personalized Medicine?

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore; Paediatric Academic Clinical Programme, Singhealth Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore.

Genome Institute of Singapore, ASTAR, Singapore; Cardiovascular Research Institute, National University of Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore.

出版信息

EBioMedicine. 2016 Feb 4;5:211-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.01.030. eCollection 2016 Mar.

DOI:10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.01.030
PMID:27077130
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4816806/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In Western cohorts, the prevalence of incidental findings (IFs) or incidentalome, referring to variants in genes that are unrelated to the patient's primary condition, is between 0.86% and 8.8%. However, data on prevalence and type of IFs in Asian population is lacking.

METHODS

In 2 cohorts of individuals with genomic sequencing performed in Singapore (total n = 377), we extracted and annotated variants in the 56 ACMG-recommended genes and filtered these variants based on the level of pathogenicity. We then analyzed the precise distribution of IFs, class of genes, related medical conditions, and potential clinical impact.

RESULTS

We found a total of 41,607 variants in the 56 genes in our cohort of 377 individuals. After filtering for rare and coding variants, we identified 14 potential variants. After reviewing primary literature, only 4 out of the 14 variants were classified to be pathogenic, while an additional two variants were classified as likely pathogenic. Overall, the cumulative prevalence of IFs (pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants) in our cohort was 1.6%.

CONCLUSION

The cumulative prevalence of IFs through genomic sequencing is low and the incidentalome may not be a significant barrier to implementation of genomics for personalized medicine.

摘要

背景

在西方队列中,偶然发现(IFs)或偶然基因组,指与患者主要病情无关的基因变异,其患病率在 0.86%至 8.8%之间。然而,亚洲人群中关于 IFs 的患病率和类型的数据尚缺乏。

方法

在新加坡进行基因组测序的 2 个人群队列中(总 n = 377),我们提取并注释了 56 个 ACMG 推荐基因中的变异,并根据致病性水平对这些变异进行了筛选。然后,我们分析了 IFs 的精确分布、基因类别、相关医疗状况和潜在的临床影响。

结果

我们在 377 名个体的 56 个基因中总共发现了 41607 个变异。在对稀有和编码变异进行过滤后,我们确定了 14 个潜在的变异。在查阅原始文献后,这 14 个变异中只有 4 个被归类为致病性,另外 2 个被归类为可能致病性。总体而言,我们队列中 IFs(致病性和可能致病性变异)的累积患病率为 1.6%。

结论

通过基因组测序偶然发现的 IFs 患病率较低,偶然基因组可能不会成为个性化医疗实施基因组学的重大障碍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ad9/4816806/db2779b8de11/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ad9/4816806/db2779b8de11/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ad9/4816806/db2779b8de11/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Incidentalome from Genomic Sequencing: A Barrier to Personalized Medicine?基因组测序的偶然发现:对个性化医疗的阻碍?
EBioMedicine. 2016 Feb 4;5:211-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.01.030. eCollection 2016 Mar.
2
Next-generation sequencing using a pre-designed gene panel for the molecular diagnosis of congenital disorders in pediatric patients.使用预先设计的基因检测板进行下一代测序,用于儿科患者先天性疾病的分子诊断。
Hum Genomics. 2015 Dec 14;9:33. doi: 10.1186/s40246-015-0055-x.
3
Identification of Medically Actionable Secondary Findings in the 1000 Genomes.在千人基因组计划中对具有医学可操作性的次要发现进行鉴定。
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 2;10(9):e0135193. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135193. eCollection 2015.
4
Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.近7000名医疗专业人员、基因组研究人员和公众对测序研究中偶然发现结果反馈的态度。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2016 Jan;24(1):21-9. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.58. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
5
Actionable, pathogenic incidental findings in 1,000 participants' exomes.1000 名参与者外显子组中的可操作、致病性偶然发现。
Am J Hum Genet. 2013 Oct 3;93(4):631-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.08.006. Epub 2013 Sep 19.
6
Next generation sequencing: implications in personalized medicine and pharmacogenomics.下一代测序:在个性化医疗和药物基因组学中的意义。
Mol Biosyst. 2016 May 24;12(6):1818-30. doi: 10.1039/c6mb00115g.
7
The use of PanDrugs to prioritize anticancer drug treatments in a case of T-ALL based on individual genomic data.基于个体基因组数据,使用泛药物优先考虑 T-ALL 患者的抗癌药物治疗。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Oct 26;19(1):1005. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6209-9.
8
Clinical exome performance for reporting secondary genetic findings.用于报告次要基因发现的临床外显子组表现。
Clin Chem. 2015 Jan;61(1):213-20. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2014.231456. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
9
Reporting Incidental Findings in Clinical Whole Exome Sequencing: Incorporation of the 2013 ACMG Recommendations into Current Practices of Genetic Counseling.临床全外显子组测序中偶发发现的报告:将2013年美国医学遗传学与基因组学学会(ACMG)的建议纳入当前遗传咨询实践
J Genet Couns. 2015 Aug;24(4):654-62. doi: 10.1007/s10897-014-9794-4. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
10
Biased pathogenic assertions of loss of function variants challenge molecular diagnosis of admixed individuals.功能丧失变异的偏倚致病性断言挑战了混合个体的分子诊断。
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2021 Sep;187(3):357-363. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31931. Epub 2021 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Secondary findings in a large Pakistani cohort tested with whole genome sequencing.大巴基斯坦队列全基因组测序检测的次要发现。
Life Sci Alliance. 2023 Jan 12;6(3). doi: 10.26508/lsa.202201673. Print 2023 Mar.
2
Classification of the canonical splice alteration c.934-2A > G is likely benign based on RNA and clinical data.根据 RNA 和临床数据,典型剪接改变 c.934-2A > G 的分类可能为良性。
Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud. 2022 Jan 10;8(1). doi: 10.1101/mcs.a006152. Print 2022 Jan.
3
Genetic Differences between Physical Injury Patients With and Without Post-traumatic Syndrome: Focus on Secondary Findings and Potential Variants Revealed by Whole Exome Sequencing.

本文引用的文献

1
Incidental Findings with Genomic Testing: Implications for Genetic Counseling Practice.基因检测的偶然发现:对遗传咨询实践的影响
Curr Genet Med Rep. 2015;3(4):166-176. doi: 10.1007/s40142-015-0075-9. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
2
Management of Incidental Findings in Clinical Genomic Sequencing.临床基因组测序中偶然发现的管理
Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2015 Oct 6;87:9.23.1-9.23.16. doi: 10.1002/0471142905.hg0923s87.
3
Surveillance recommendations for patients with germline TP53 mutations.种系TP53突变患者的监测建议。
有和没有创伤后综合征的身体损伤患者之间的基因差异:关注全外显子测序揭示的次要发现和潜在变异体。
Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2021 Nov 30;19(4):683-694. doi: 10.9758/cpn.2021.19.4.683.
4
Novel Pathogenic Germline Variant of the Adenomatous Polyposis Coli (APC) Gene, p.S2627Gfs*12 Identified in a Mild Phenotype of APC-Associated Polyposis: A Case Report.在APC相关息肉病的轻度表型中鉴定出腺瘤性息肉病大肠杆菌(APC)基因的新型致病种系变体p.S2627Gfs*12:病例报告
Am J Case Rep. 2020 Dec 11;21:e927293. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.927293.
5
Implementation of genomics in medical practice to deliver precision medicine for an Asian population.在医学实践中实施基因组学,为亚洲人群提供精准医疗。
NPJ Genom Med. 2019 Jun 7;4:12. doi: 10.1038/s41525-019-0085-8. eCollection 2019.
6
Will New Genetic Techniques Like Exome Sequencing Obviate the Need for Clinical Expertise? No.像外显子组测序这样的新基因技术会使临床专业知识变得不再必要吗?不会。
Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2016 Oct 17;4(1):39-41. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.12443. eCollection 2017 Jan-Feb.
7
High-frequency actionable pathogenic exome variants in an average-risk cohort.平均风险队列中的高频可操作致病外显子变异
Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud. 2018 Dec 17;4(6). doi: 10.1101/mcs.a003178. Print 2018 Dec.
8
1 in 38 individuals at risk of a dominant medically actionable disease.每 38 个人中就有 1 个人有患显性医学上可干预疾病的风险。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2019 Feb;27(2):325-330. doi: 10.1038/s41431-018-0284-2. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
9
Population genomics in South East Asia captures unexpectedly high carrier frequency for treatable inherited disorders.东南亚的群体基因组学揭示了意料之外的高可治疗遗传性疾病携带者频率。
Genet Med. 2019 Jan;21(1):207-212. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0008-6. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
10
Actionable secondary findings from whole-genome sequencing of 954 East Asians.954 位东亚人全基因组测序的可操作的次要发现。
Hum Genet. 2018 Jan;137(1):31-37. doi: 10.1007/s00439-017-1852-1. Epub 2017 Nov 11.
Curr Opin Oncol. 2015 Jul;27(4):332-7. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000200.
4
Global implementation of genomic medicine: We are not alone.全球实施基因组医学:我们并不孤单。
Sci Transl Med. 2015 Jun 3;7(290):290ps13. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aab0194.
5
Factors influencing success of clinical genome sequencing across a broad spectrum of disorders.影响广泛疾病临床基因组测序成功的因素。
Nat Genet. 2015 Jul;47(7):717-726. doi: 10.1038/ng.3304. Epub 2015 May 18.
6
Frequency and spectrum of actionable pathogenic secondary findings in 196 Korean exomes.196 个韩国外显子组中可采取行动的致病性二级发现的频率和频谱。
Genet Med. 2015 Dec;17(12):1007-11. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.26. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
7
Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.序列变异解读的标准与指南:美国医学遗传学与基因组学学会和分子病理学协会的联合共识推荐
Genet Med. 2015 May;17(5):405-24. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.30. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
8
A systematic approach to the reporting of medically relevant findings from whole genome sequencing.一种用于报告全基因组测序医学相关发现的系统方法。
BMC Med Genet. 2014 Dec 14;15:134. doi: 10.1186/s12881-014-0134-1.
9
Reporting incidental findings in genomic scale clinical sequencing--a clinical laboratory perspective: a report of the Association for Molecular Pathology.基因组规模临床测序中偶然发现的报告——临床实验室视角:分子病理学协会报告
J Mol Diagn. 2015 Mar;17(2):107-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2014.10.004. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
10
Actionable exomic incidental findings in 6503 participants: challenges of variant classification.6503名参与者中可采取行动的外显子组偶然发现:变异分类的挑战
Genome Res. 2015 Mar;25(3):305-15. doi: 10.1101/gr.183483.114. Epub 2015 Jan 30.