Department of Human Genetics, Donders Centre for Neuroscience, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2019 Feb;27(2):325-330. doi: 10.1038/s41431-018-0284-2. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
Clinical genomic sequencing can identify pathogenic variants unrelated to the initial clinical question, but of medical relevance to the patients and their families. With ongoing discussions on the utility of disclosing or searching for such variants, it is of crucial importance to obtain unbiased insight in the prevalence of these incidental or secondary findings, in order to better weigh potential risks and benefits. Previous studies have reported a broad range of secondary findings ranging from 1 to 9%, merely attributable to differences in study design, cohorts tested, sequence technology used and genes analyzed. Here, we analyzed WES data of 1640 anonymized healthy Dutch individuals to establish the frequency of medically actionable disease alleles in an outbred population of European descent. Our study shows that 1 in 38 healthy individuals (2.7%) has a (likely) pathogenic variant in one of 59 medically actionable dominant disease genes for which the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) recommends disclosure. Additionally, we identified 36 individuals (2.2%) to be a carrier of a recessive pathogenic disease allele. Whereas these frequencies of secondary findings are in line with what has been reported in the East-Asian population, the pathogenic variants are differently distributed across the 59 ACMG genes. Our results contribute to the debate on genetic risk factor screening in healthy individuals and the discussion whether the potential benefits of this knowledge and related preventive options, outweigh the risk of the emotional impact of the test result and possible stigmatization.
临床基因组测序可以识别与初始临床问题无关但与患者及其家属的医疗相关的致病性变异。随着对披露或搜索此类变异的实用性的持续讨论,获得对这些偶然或次要发现的普遍性的无偏见的洞察至关重要,以便更好地权衡潜在的风险和益处。以前的研究报告了广泛的次要发现,范围从 1%到 9%不等,这仅仅归因于研究设计、测试队列、使用的测序技术和分析的基因的差异。在这里,我们分析了 1640 名匿名荷兰健康个体的 WES 数据,以确定在欧洲血统的杂合人群中具有医学可操作性的疾病等位基因的频率。我们的研究表明,在 38 名健康个体(2.7%)中,有 1 名(可能)致病性变体存在于 59 个医学上可操作的显性疾病基因之一中,美国医学遗传学与基因组学学院(ACMG)建议对这些基因进行披露。此外,我们还发现 36 名个体(2.2%)是隐性致病性疾病等位基因的携带者。虽然这些次要发现的频率与东亚人群的报道一致,但致病性变体在 59 个 ACMG 基因中的分布不同。我们的研究结果有助于遗传风险因素在健康个体中的筛查以及相关预防措施的潜在收益是否超过测试结果的情感影响和可能的污名化的风险的讨论。