Sop Ivana, Mady Maricic Barbara, Pavlic Andrej, Legovic Mario, Spalj Stjepan
a School of Medicine , University of Rijeka , Rijeka , Croatia.
b Private Dental Practice Mady-Maricic , Rijeka , Croatia.
Cranio. 2016 Sep;34(5):303-8. doi: 10.1080/08869634.2015.1106809. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
The objective was to investigate the severity of skeletal mandibular asymmetry in children with mixed dentition and other factors associated with asymmetry.
The study was cross sectional, with stratified sampling according to malocclusion type consisting of 205 subjects with mixed dentition (median 10, interquartile range 9-11 years). There were 59 subjects presenting Class II/1, 77 Class II/2, and 69 Class III. The mandibular asymmetry has been estimated from orthopantomograms using the Habets' method and the dental maturation by Demirjian's method. The sagittal skeletal relationship and facial growth pattern were assessed from lateral cephalograms.
Asymmetries in general, were not rare and were more present in the condylar height rather than in the height of the ramus. The highest severity of condylar asymmetry was in Class II/2 subjects (median of asymmetry index 7.3; 64% subjects exhibiting moderate and severe asymmetry), while the Class III subjects exhibited the highest severity of both ramus and total height asymmetry (2.1; 13% and 2.0; 15%, respectively). Multiple logistic regression unveiled male gender as the only predictor of moderate or significant overall asymmetry. Dental age, the difference between dental and chronological age, and facial growth pattern were not significant predictors of asymmetries.
Overall, asymmetries in mixed dentition cannot be considered rare; however, no strong relationships between asymmetry and observed biological factors were found.
本研究旨在调查混合牙列期儿童下颌骨骨骼不对称的严重程度以及与不对称相关的其他因素。
本研究为横断面研究,根据错牙合类型进行分层抽样,共纳入205名混合牙列期儿童(年龄中位数为10岁,四分位间距为9 - 11岁)。其中,安氏II类1分类59例,安氏II类2分类77例,安氏III类69例。采用哈贝茨(Habets)法通过曲面断层片评估下颌骨不对称情况,采用德米尔坚(Demirjian)法评估牙齿成熟度。通过头颅侧位片评估矢状面骨骼关系和面部生长模式。
总体而言,不对称情况并不罕见,且更多表现为髁突高度不对称而非升支高度不对称。髁突不对称最严重的是安氏II类2分类患者(不对称指数中位数为7.3;64%的患者表现为中度和重度不对称),而安氏III类患者升支和总高度不对称最为严重(分别为2.1;13%和2.0;15%)。多元逻辑回归显示,男性是中度或显著整体不对称的唯一预测因素。牙龄、牙龄与实足年龄之差以及面部生长模式并非不对称的显著预测因素。
总体而言,混合牙列期的不对称情况并非罕见;然而,未发现不对称与观察到的生物学因素之间存在强烈关联。