Suppr超能文献

磁共振成像-经直肠超声引导下靶向活检与经直肠超声引导下系统活检诊断前列腺癌的非劣效性研究

Are Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Targeted Biopsies Noninferior to Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Systematic Biopsies for the Detection of Prostate Cancer?

机构信息

Department of Urology, Cochin University Hospital, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France; Inserm Unit U1151, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.

Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France.

出版信息

J Urol. 2016 Oct;196(4):1069-75. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.04.003. Epub 2016 Apr 12.

Abstract

PURPOSE

In men with suspicion of prostate cancer the standard of cancer detection is transrectal ultrasound guided 10 to 12-core systematic biopsy. The targeted biopsy only strategy using magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound image registration is gaining in popularity. We assessed the noninferiority of targeted vs systematic biopsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between June and October 2014 a total of 108 biopsy naïve patients with prostate specific antigen between 4 and 20 ng/ml, normal rectal examination and a single suspicious image on magnetic resonance imaging were included in study at 7 centers. Patients underwent systematic biopsy by a first operator blinded to magnetic resonance imaging, immediately followed by 3 targeted biopsies within the suspicious image by a second operator. The primary end point was the cancer detection rate. The noninferiority margin was set at -5%. The secondary end points were the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (maximum cancer core length 5 mm or greater for Gleason 6 or any Gleason 7 or greater disease) and procedure duration.

RESULTS

Systematic and targeted biopsies detected cancer in 66 (61.1%) and 61 patients (56.5%), respectively. The mean difference was -4.5% with a 95% CI lower bound of -11.8%. A total of 13 patients with protocol violations were excluded from the per protocol analysis, which showed a mean difference of -5.2% with a 95% CI lower bound of -13.1%. Clinically significant prostate cancer was detected in 50 (46.2%) and 52 patients (48.1%) with systematic and targeted biopsies, respectively (p = 0.69). The mean ± SD duration of image fusion plus targeted biopsy was 16.7 ± 7 minutes vs 7.4 ± 3 for systematic biopsy (p <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Targeted biopsy seemed to be inferior to systematic biopsy for overall cancer detection. Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer did not differ between targeted and systematic biopsies.

摘要

目的

在疑似前列腺癌的男性中,癌症检测的标准是经直肠超声引导 10-12 核系统活检。使用磁共振成像-经直肠超声图像配准的靶向活检策略越来越受欢迎。我们评估了靶向与系统活检的非劣效性。

材料与方法

2014 年 6 月至 10 月期间,共有 108 例前列腺特异性抗原在 4-20ng/ml 之间、直肠检查正常且磁共振成像上只有一个可疑图像的活检初治患者,在 7 个中心参与了这项研究。患者由一名对磁共振成像不知情的第一操作者行系统活检,然后由第二操作者在可疑图像内行 3 次靶向活检。主要终点是癌症检出率。非劣效性边界设定为-5%。次要终点是临床显著前列腺癌(最大癌核心长度为 5mm 或更大的 Gleason 6 或任何 Gleason 7 或更高疾病)的检出率和手术时间。

结果

系统活检和靶向活检分别检出癌症 66(61.1%)和 61 例(56.5%)。平均差异为-4.5%,95%置信区间下限为-11.8%。有 13 例违反方案的患者被排除在方案分析之外,其中平均差异为-5.2%,95%置信区间下限为-13.1%。系统活检和靶向活检分别检出临床显著前列腺癌 50(46.2%)和 52 例(48.1%)(p=0.69)。图像融合加靶向活检的平均+SD 时间为 16.7±7 分钟,而系统活检为 7.4±3 分钟(p<0.001)。

结论

靶向活检在总体癌症检出方面似乎劣于系统活检。靶向和系统活检在检出临床显著前列腺癌方面无差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验