Dharmarajan Kumar
Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT and Yale-New Haven Hospital Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Can J Cardiol. 2016 Nov;32(11):1306-1314. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2016.01.030. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
Older adults are frequently readmitted to the hospital soon after hospitalization for common cardiovascular conditions. Yet there are few high-quality data on the best strategies to reduce short-term readmissions because most studies have involved small numbers of participants, single-centre design, and strong susceptibility to bias. Despite these limitations in the literature, a clear signal exists that most studies involving a singular type of intervention, a singular type of health provider, or a low intensity of intervention have failed to reduce readmissions. In contrast, interventions that are most likely to lower readmissions have used comprehensive approaches, including combined hospital and postacute care, multimodal interventions, multidisciplinary teams, or frequent longitudinal contact. Components of a comprehensive approach with the highest level of evidence include high-quality, disease-specific care; multiple transitional care interventions; involvement of multidisciplinary teams; early and frequent outpatient follow-up; and, when possible, home visits. These findings are consistent with data demonstrating that older adults have multiple sources of vulnerability and experience elevated readmission risk from a broad spectrum of medical conditions for an extended time after hospital discharge. Because readmission reduction is difficult and requires new ways of conceptualizing links between inpatient and postacute care, financial incentives may ultimately be required to motivate hospitals and health systems to redesign care processes, deploy new resources, and collaborate with out-of-hospital providers and organizations.
老年人因常见心血管疾病住院后不久往往会再次入院。然而,关于减少短期再入院的最佳策略,高质量数据很少,因为大多数研究参与者数量少、采用单中心设计且极易产生偏差。尽管文献存在这些局限性,但有一个明确的信号是,大多数涉及单一类型干预、单一类型医疗服务提供者或低强度干预的研究都未能降低再入院率。相比之下,最有可能降低再入院率的干预措施采用了综合方法,包括联合医院和急性后期护理、多模式干预、多学科团队或频繁的纵向联系。证据水平最高的综合方法的组成部分包括高质量的、针对特定疾病的护理;多种过渡性护理干预措施;多学科团队的参与;早期和频繁的门诊随访;以及在可能的情况下进行家访。这些发现与数据一致,这些数据表明老年人有多种脆弱性来源,并且在出院后的很长一段时间内,因广泛的医疗状况而面临再入院风险升高。由于降低再入院率很困难,并且需要新的方式来概念化住院护理和急性后期护理之间的联系,最终可能需要经济激励措施来促使医院和卫生系统重新设计护理流程、调配新资源,并与院外医疗服务提供者和组织合作。