Hicks Lindsey L, McNulty James K, Meltzer Andrea L, Olson Michael A
Department of Psychology, Florida State University
Department of Psychology, Florida State University.
Psychol Sci. 2016 Jun;27(6):836-47. doi: 10.1177/0956797616638650. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
A strong predisposition to engage in sexual intercourse likely evolved in humans because sex is crucial to reproduction. Given that meeting interpersonal preferences tends to promote positive relationship evaluations, sex within a relationship should be positively associated with relationship satisfaction. Nevertheless, prior research has been inconclusive in demonstrating such a link, with longitudinal and experimental studies showing no association between sexual frequency and relationship satisfaction. Crucially, though, all prior research has utilized explicit reports of satisfaction, which reflect deliberative processes that may override the more automatic implications of phylogenetically older evolved preferences. Accordingly, capturing the implications of sexual frequency for relationship evaluations may require implicit measurements that bypass deliberative reasoning. Consistent with this idea, one cross-sectional and one 3-year study of newlywed couples revealed a positive association between sexual frequency and automatic partner evaluations but not explicit satisfaction. These findings highlight the importance of automatic measurements to understanding interpersonal relationships.
人类很可能进化出了强烈的进行性交的倾向,因为性对于繁殖至关重要。鉴于满足人际偏好往往会促进对关系的积极评价,恋爱关系中的性行为应该与关系满意度呈正相关。然而,先前的研究在证明这种联系方面尚无定论,纵向研究和实验研究表明性频率与关系满意度之间没有关联。不过,至关重要的是,所有先前的研究都使用了明确的满意度报告,这些报告反映的是深思熟虑的过程,而这些过程可能会压倒进化历史更悠久的偏好所产生的更自动的影响。因此,要捕捉性频率对关系评价的影响,可能需要采用绕过深思熟虑推理的隐性测量方法。与此观点一致,一项针对新婚夫妇的横断面研究和一项为期3年的研究表明,性频率与对伴侣的自动评价呈正相关,但与明确的满意度无关。这些发现凸显了自动测量对于理解人际关系的重要性。