Pakpour Amir H, Kumar Santhosh, Scheerman Janneke F M, Lin Chung-Ying, Fridlund Bengt, Jansson Henrik
Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Shahid Bahounar BLV, Qazvin 3419759811, Iran.
Population Social Health Research Program, Griffith Health Institute & School of Dentistry and Oral Health, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Injury. 2016 Jun;47(6):1345-52. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.03.022. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
The study aimed to compare the oral health variables, general, and oral health-related quality of life (QoL), depression, and anxiety between spinal cord injury (SCI) patients and healthy controls and also to determine the key factors related to the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in the SCI patients.
A total of 203 SCI patients and 203 healthy controls were enrolled. Patients and healthy adults were invited to attend a dental clinic to complete the study measures and undergo oral clinical examinations. OHRQoL was assessed by the 14-item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14), and the general health-related quality of life (GHRQoL) was evaluated by SF-36. In SCI patients, depression and anxiety were recorded using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), while Functional Assessment Measure (FAM) was used to assess dependence and disability. All the subjects were examined for caries which was quantified using the decayed, missing, and filled Teeth (DMFT) index, gingival bleeding index (GI), plaque index, and periodontal status by community periodontal index (CPI).
The analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) revealed significant differences between the two groups in terms of oral health expressed in DMFT, oral hygiene, and periodontal status, controlled for age, gender, family income, and occupational status (p<0.001). Using the hierarchical linear regression analyses, in the final model, which accounted for 18% of the total variance (F(126.7), p<0.01), significant predictors of OHRQoL were irregular tooth brushing (β=1.23; 95% CI=1.06; 1.41), smoking (β=0.82; 95% CI=0.66; 0.97), dry mouth (β=0.37; 95% CI=-0.65 to 0.10) functional and motor functioning (β=0.32; 95% CI=-0.45 to 0.17), DMFT (β=0.06; 95% CI=0.02; 0.09), CPI (β=0.22; 95% CI=0.04; 0.04), physical component measure of GHRQoL (β=-0.275; 95% CI=-0.42 to 0.13), lesion level at the lumbar-sacral (β=-0.18; 95% CI=-0.29 to -0.06) and thoracic level (β=-0.09; 95% CI=-0.11 to -0.06).
SCI patients had poor oral hygiene practices, greater levels of plaque, gingival bleeding, and caries experience than the healthy controls. In addition, more number of SCI patients had periodontal pockets and dry mouth than the comparative group. SCI patients experienced more depression and anxiety, poor GHRQoL, and OHRQoL than the healthy control group. The factors that influenced OHRQoL in SCI patients were age, toothbrushing frequency, smoking, oral clinical status, depression, physical component of GHRQoL, and level of lesion.
本研究旨在比较脊髓损伤(SCI)患者与健康对照者的口腔健康变量、总体及口腔健康相关生活质量(QoL)、抑郁和焦虑情况,并确定与SCI患者口腔健康相关生活质量(OHRQoL)相关的关键因素。
共纳入203例SCI患者和203名健康对照者。患者和健康成年人被邀请到牙科诊所完成研究测量并接受口腔临床检查。OHRQoL采用14项口腔健康影响程度量表(OHIP - 14)进行评估,总体健康相关生活质量(GHRQoL)采用SF - 36进行评估。在SCI患者中,使用医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)记录抑郁和焦虑情况,同时使用功能评估量表(FAM)评估依赖程度和残疾情况。对所有受试者进行龋齿检查,使用龋失补牙指数(DMFT)、牙龈出血指数(GI)、菌斑指数进行量化,并通过社区牙周指数(CPI)评估牙周状况。
协方差分析(ANCOVA)显示,在控制年龄、性别、家庭收入和职业状况后,两组在DMFT所表示的口腔健康、口腔卫生和牙周状况方面存在显著差异(p<0.001)。使用分层线性回归分析,在最终模型中,该模型解释了总方差的18%(F(126.7),p<0.01),OHRQoL的显著预测因素包括刷牙不规律(β = 1.23;95%CI = 1.6;1.41)、吸烟(β = 0.82;95%CI = 0.66;0.97)、口干(β = 0.37;95%CI = -0.65至0.10)、功能和运动功能(β = 0.32;95%CI = -0.45至0.17)、DMFT(β = 0.06;95%CI = 0.02;0.09)、CPI(β = 0.22;95%CI = 0.04;0.04)、GHRQoL的身体成分测量值(β = -0.275;95%CI = -0.42至0.13)、腰骶部病变水平(β = -0.18;95%CI = -0.29至 -0.06)和胸部病变水平(β = -0.09;95%CI = -0.11至 -0.06)。
SCI患者的口腔卫生习惯较差,菌斑、牙龈出血和龋齿发生率高于健康对照者。此外,与对照组相比,更多的SCI患者有牙周袋和口干问题。SCI患者比健康对照组经历更多的抑郁和焦虑,GHRQoL和OHRQoL较差。影响SCI患者OHRQoL的因素包括年龄、刷牙频率、吸烟、口腔临床状况、抑郁、GHRQoL的身体成分以及病变水平。