Suppr超能文献

眼后膜短程放射治疗治疗新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性的既往治疗(MERLOT):一项 3 期随机对照试验。

Epimacular Brachytherapy for Previously Treated Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (MERLOT): A Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

School of Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Ophthalmology, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

Department of Ophthalmology, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Ophthalmology. 2016 Jun;123(6):1287-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.02.028. Epub 2016 Apr 13.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the safety and efficacy of epimacular brachytherapy (EMB) for patients with chronic, active, neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

DESIGN

Phase 3 randomized controlled trial.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients (n = 363) with neovascular AMD already receiving intravitreal ranibizumab injections.

INTERVENTION

Either pars plana vitrectomy with 24-gray EMB and ongoing pro re nata (PRN) ranibizumab (n = 224) or ongoing PRN ranibizumab monotherapy (n = 119).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The coprimary outcomes, at 12 months, were the number of PRN ranibizumab injections and Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) best-corrected visual acuity (VA). Secondary outcomes included the proportion of participants losing fewer than 15 ETDRS letters, angiographic total lesion size, choroidal neovascularization (CNV) size, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) foveal thickness. A predefined subgroup analysis tested the influence of baseline ocular characteristics on the response to EMB.

RESULTS

The mean number of PRN ranibizumab injections was 4.8 in the EMB arm and 4.1 in the ranibizumab monotherapy arm (P = 0.068). The mean VA change was -4.8 letters in the EMB arm and -0.9 letters in the ranibizumab arm (95% confidence interval of difference between groups, -6.6 to -1.8 letters). The proportion of participants losing fewer than 15 letters was 84% in the EMB arm and 92% in the ranibizumab arm (P = 0.007). In the EMB arm, the mean total lesion size increased by 1.2 mm(2) versus 0.4 mm(2) in the ranibizumab arm (P = 0.27). The CNV size decreased by 0.5 mm(2) in the EMB arm and by 1.3 mm(2) in the ranibizumab arm (P = 0.27). The OCT foveal thickness decreased by 1.0 μm in the EMB arm and by 15.7 μm in the ranibizumab arm (P = 0.43). Most subgroups favored ranibizumab monotherapy, some significantly so. One participant showed retinal vascular abnormality attributed to radiation, but otherwise safety was acceptable.

CONCLUSIONS

These results do not support the use of EMB for chronic, active, neovascular AMD. Safety is acceptable out to 12 months, but radiation retinopathy can occur later, so further follow-up is planned.

摘要

目的

评估眼内黄斑部巩膜放射治疗(EMB)用于慢性、活动性、新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)患者的安全性和疗效。

设计

3 期随机对照试验。

参与者

已接受玻璃体内雷珠单抗注射的新生血管性 AMD 患者(n=363)。

干预措施

要么行巩膜扣带术联合 24 格雷姆 EMB 和持续按需(PRN)雷珠单抗(n=224),要么持续 PRN 雷珠单抗单药治疗(n=119)。

主要观察指标

12 个月时的主要疗效指标为 PRN 雷珠单抗注射次数和早期糖尿病视网膜病变研究(ETDRS)最佳矫正视力(VA)。次要观察指标包括视力丧失少于 15 个 ETDRS 字母的参与者比例、血管造影总病变大小、脉络膜新生血管(CNV)大小和光学相干断层扫描(OCT)黄斑中心凹厚度。一个预先设定的亚组分析测试了基线眼部特征对 EMB 反应的影响。

结果

EMB 组的 PRN 雷珠单抗注射次数平均为 4.8 次,雷珠单抗单药组为 4.1 次(P=0.068)。EMB 组的平均 VA 变化为-4.8 个字母,雷珠单抗组为-0.9 个字母(两组间差异的 95%置信区间为-6.6 至-1.8 个字母)。视力丧失少于 15 个字母的参与者比例在 EMB 组为 84%,在雷珠单抗组为 92%(P=0.007)。EMB 组的总病变大小平均增加 1.2mm²,而雷珠单抗组增加 0.4mm²(P=0.27)。CNV 大小在 EMB 组减少 0.5mm²,在雷珠单抗组减少 1.3mm²(P=0.27)。OCT 黄斑中心凹厚度在 EMB 组减少 1.0μm,在雷珠单抗组减少 15.7μm(P=0.43)。大多数亚组倾向于雷珠单抗单药治疗,其中一些有显著差异。一名患者出现归因于放射的视网膜血管异常,但其他方面的安全性可以接受。

结论

这些结果不支持将 EMB 用于慢性、活动性、新生血管性 AMD。安全性可接受,最长可达 12 个月,但可能会出现放射性视网膜病变,因此计划进一步随访。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验