Fuhrmann Julia, Jouni Rabie, Alex Jenny, Zöllner Heike, Wesche Jan, Greinacher Andreas, Bakchoul Tamam
Institute for Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Zentrum für Klinische Transfusionsmedizin Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Transfusion. 2016 Jun;56(6):1370-6. doi: 10.1111/trf.13602. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
The NOD/SCID mouse model is a unique and sophisticated method to study the survival of human platelets (PLTs) in vivo. Meanwhile, several research groups adopted this model to analyze a wide range of PLT antibodies. Differences exist between the research groups regarding the method of PLT injection, the amount and route of antibody injection, and the preparation of blood samples collected from the animal, making it difficult to compare results between studies.
We compared the survival of human PLTs infused into NOD/SCID mice via the tail vein or the retro-orbital plexus. The percentage of circulating human PLTs in the mouse circulation was determined by flow cytometry. Murine blood samples were prepared using two different methods: 1) direct fixation of whole blood samples and 2) isolation of PLTs by density gradient centrifugation.
Recovery of human PLTs after tail vein injection was comparable to retro-orbital injection (13% vs. 11% of all circulating PLTs, p = 0.401). However, the survival rate of tail vein-infused PLTs was higher than that of retro-orbitally injected PLTs (median PLT survival after 5 hr 84% vs. 56%, p = 0.025). Moreover, we observed that determination of circulating human PLTs in directly fixed murine whole blood samples shows better reproducibility compared to the density gradient centrifugation method.
Tail vein injection of human PLTs into the NOD/SCID mice is superior to retro-orbital injection in terms of human PLT survival. Direct fixation of whole blood samples allows better reproducibility of results compared to the density gradient centrifugation method.
NOD/SCID小鼠模型是一种独特且复杂的方法,用于研究人血小板(PLT)在体内的存活情况。同时,多个研究小组采用该模型分析了多种PLT抗体。各研究小组在PLT注射方法、抗体注射量和途径以及从动物采集的血样制备方面存在差异,这使得研究结果难以相互比较。
我们比较了通过尾静脉或眶后丛将人PLT输注到NOD/SCID小鼠体内后的存活情况。通过流式细胞术测定小鼠循环中循环人PLT的百分比。使用两种不同方法制备小鼠血样:1)全血样本直接固定;2)通过密度梯度离心分离PLT。
尾静脉注射后人PLT的回收率与眶后注射相当(分别占所有循环PLT的13%和11%,p = 0.401)。然而,尾静脉输注PLT的存活率高于眶后注射的PLT(5小时后PLT存活中位数分别为84%和56%,p = 0.025)。此外,我们观察到,与密度梯度离心法相比,直接固定的小鼠全血样本中循环人PLT的测定显示出更好的可重复性。
就人PLT存活而言,将人PLT尾静脉注射到NOD/SCID小鼠体内优于眶后注射。与密度梯度离心法相比,全血样本直接固定可使结果具有更好的可重复性。