Jackson Michelle C, Woodford Darragh J, Bellingan Terence A, Weyl Olaf L F, Potgieter Michael J, Rivers-Moore Nick A, Ellender Bruce R, Fourie Hermina E, Chimimba Christian T
Department of Zoology and Entomology Centre for Invasion Biology University of Pretoria Private Bag X 20 Hatfield 0028 South Africa.
School of Animal, Plant and Environmental Sciences University of the Witwatersrand Johannesburg South Africa; South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity (SAIAB) Grahamstown 6140 South Africa; Centre for Invasion Biology SAIAB Grahamstown 6140 South Africa.
Ecol Evol. 2016 Feb 17;6(6):1745-52. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1893. eCollection 2016 Mar.
Studies on resource sharing and partitioning generally consider species that occur in the same habitat. However, subsidies between linked habitats, such as streams and riparian zones, create potential for competition between populations which never directly interact. Evidence suggests that the abundance of riparian consumers declines after fish invasion and a subsequent increase in resource sharing of emerging insects. However, diet overlap has not been investigated. Here, we examine the trophic niche of native fish, invasive fish, and native spiders in South Africa using stable isotope analysis. We compared spider abundance and diet at upstream fishless and downstream fish sites and quantified niche overlap with invasive and native fish. Spider abundance was consistently higher at upstream fishless sites compared with paired downstream fish sites, suggesting that the fish reduced aquatic resource availability to riparian consumers. Spiders incorporated more aquatic than terrestrial insects in their diet, with aquatic insects accounting for 45-90% of spider mass. In three of four invaded trout rivers, we found that the average proportion of aquatic resources in web-building spider diet was higher at fishless sites compared to fish sites. The probability of web-building and ground spiders overlapping into the trophic niche of invasive brown and rainbow trout was as high as 26 and 51%, respectively. In contrast, the probability of spiders overlapping into the trophic niche of native fish was always less than 5%. Our results suggest that spiders share resources with invasive fish. In contrast, spiders had a low probability of trophic overlap with native fish indicating that the traits of invaders may be important in determining their influence on ecosystem subsidies. We have added to the growing body of evidence that invaders can have cross-ecosystem impacts and demonstrated that this can be due to niche overlap.
关于资源共享与分配的研究通常考虑的是出现在同一栖息地的物种。然而,相互关联的栖息地之间的资源补贴,比如溪流和河岸带之间的补贴,会使从未直接相互作用的种群之间产生竞争的可能性。有证据表明,鱼类入侵以及随后新兴昆虫资源共享的增加之后,河岸带消费者的数量会减少。然而,食物重叠情况尚未得到研究。在此,我们运用稳定同位素分析来研究南非本地鱼类、入侵鱼类和本地蜘蛛的营养生态位。我们比较了上游无鱼区域和下游有鱼区域的蜘蛛数量和食物,并量化了与入侵鱼类和本地鱼类的生态位重叠情况。与配对的下游有鱼区域相比,上游无鱼区域的蜘蛛数量始终更高,这表明鱼类减少了河岸带消费者可获取的水生资源。蜘蛛在其食物中摄入的水生昆虫比陆生昆虫更多,水生昆虫占蜘蛛体重的45%至90%。在四条有入侵鳟鱼的河流中的三条里,我们发现,与有鱼区域相比,无鱼区域结网蜘蛛食物中水生资源的平均比例更高。结网蜘蛛和地蜘蛛与入侵的褐鳟和虹鳟营养生态位重叠的概率分别高达26%和51%。相比之下,蜘蛛与本地鱼类营养生态位重叠的概率始终小于5%。我们的研究结果表明,蜘蛛与入侵鱼类共享资源。相比之下,蜘蛛与本地鱼类营养重叠的概率较低,这表明入侵者的特性可能在决定它们对生态系统补贴的影响方面很重要。我们补充了越来越多的证据,证明入侵者会产生跨生态系统的影响,并证明这可能是由于生态位重叠所致。