Department of Gastroenterology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Department of Medicine, Paris-Descartes University, Paris, France.
Department of Medicine, Paris-Descartes University, Paris, France; Department of Pathology, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France.
United European Gastroenterol J. 2016 Apr;4(2):207-15. doi: 10.1177/2050640615608748. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
The possible benefit of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early neoplasia arising in Barrett's esophagus remains controversial. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of ESD for the treatment of early Barrett's neoplasia.
All consecutive patients undergoing ESD for the resection of a visible lesion in a Barrett's esophagus, either suspicious of submucosal infiltration or exceeding 10 mm in size, between February 2012 and January 2015 were prospectively included. The primary endpoint was the rate of curative resection of carcinoma, defined as histologically complete resection of adenocarcinomas without poor histoprognostic factors.
Thirty-five patients (36 lesions) with a mean age of 66.2 ± 12 years, a mean ASA score of 2.1 ± 0.7, and a mean C4M6 Barrett's segment were included. The mean procedure time was 191 ± 79 mn, and the mean size of the resected specimen was 51.3 ± 23 mm. En bloc resection rate was 89%. Lesions were 12 ± 15 mm in size, and 81% (29/36) were invasive adenocarcinomas, six of which with submucosal invasion. Although R0 resection of carcinoma was 72.4%, the curative resection rate was 66% (19/29). After a mean follow-up of 12.9 ± 9 months, 16 (45.7%) patients had required additional treatment, among whom nine underwent surgical resection, and seven further endoscopic treatments. Metachronous lesions or recurrence of cancer developed during the follow-up period in 17.2% of the patients. The overall complication rate was 16.7%, including 8.3% perforations, all conservatively managed, and no bleeding. The 30-day mortality was 0%.
In this early experience, ESD yielded a moderate curative resection rate in Barrett's neoplasia. At present, improvements are needed if ESD is to replace piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection in the management of Barrett's neoplasia.
内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)治疗 Barrett 食管早期肿瘤的潜在益处仍存在争议。本研究旨在评估 ESD 治疗 Barrett 食管早期肿瘤的疗效和安全性。
2012 年 2 月至 2015 年 1 月,连续纳入因 Barrett 食管中可见病灶(黏膜下浸润可疑或直径超过 10mm)而行 ESD 切除的患者。主要终点为癌的根治性切除率,定义为组织学上完全切除腺癌且无不良组织学预后因素。
共纳入 35 例(36 个病灶)患者,平均年龄为 66.2±12 岁,ASA 评分平均为 2.1±0.7,C4M6 段 Barrett 食管平均长度为 6.2±0.7cm。平均手术时间为 191±79 分钟,切除标本平均大小为 51.3±23mm。整块切除率为 89%。病灶大小为 12±15mm,81%(29/36)为浸润性腺癌,其中 6 例为黏膜下浸润。尽管癌的 R0 切除率为 72.4%,但根治性切除率为 66%(29/36)。平均随访 12.9±9 个月后,16 例(45.7%)患者需要进一步治疗,其中 9 例接受了手术切除,7 例接受了进一步的内镜治疗。在随访期间,17.2%的患者出现了新发肿瘤或肿瘤复发。总的并发症发生率为 16.7%,包括 8.3%的穿孔,均经保守治疗,无出血。30 天死亡率为 0%。
在本项早期经验中,ESD 治疗 Barrett 食管肿瘤的根治性切除率中等。目前,如果 ESD 要取代分片内镜黏膜切除术来治疗 Barrett 食管肿瘤,还需要进一步改进。