Maeda Ryozo, Minami Yuichiro, Haruki Shintaro, Kanbayashi Keigo, Itani Ryosuke, Suzuki Atsushi, Ejima Koichiro, Shiga Tsuyoshi, Shoda Morio, Hagiwara Nobuhisa
Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Jul 1;214:419-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.03.231. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
Previous studies reported that the presence of midventricular obstruction (MVO) was an independent determinant of sudden death and potentially lethal arrhythmic events in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). However, it remains unclear whether implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) improves survival in HCM patients with MVO. In addition, the risk factors for lethal arrhythmic events in MVO-HCM patients are not fully understood. The aim of this study was to provide an overview of the ICD therapy on sudden death prevention, and to determine the risk factors for lethal arrhythmic events in MVO-HCM patients.
This study included 593 HCM patients. Left ventricular MVO was diagnosed when the peak midventricular gradient was estimated as ≥30mmHg.
MVO was identified in 56 patients (9.4%), and 15 of the 56 MVO-HCM patients (26.8%) received an ICD. Six of 15 ICD-implanted patients (40.0%) had appropriate ICD interventions over the follow-up period of 6.5±5.1years after ICD implantation. Although two of 42 patients without an ICD died suddenly, no patients experienced sudden death after ICD implantation in patients with an ICD throughout the follow-up period of 9.0±8.0years after referral to our hospital. By multivariate analysis, maximal wall thickness was an independent determinant of lethal arrhythmic events in MVO-HCM patients.
A quarter of MVO-HCM patients received an ICD, and the incidence of appropriate ICD intervention was about 6.2%/year. It may be necessary to give careful consideration to the prevention of lethal arrhythmic events in MVO-HCM patients, especially those with severe left ventricular hypertrophy.
既往研究报道,室中隔梗阻(MVO)的存在是肥厚型心肌病(HCM)患者猝死及潜在致命性心律失常事件的独立决定因素。然而,植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)能否改善合并MVO的HCM患者的生存率仍不明确。此外,MVO-HCM患者发生致命性心律失常事件的危险因素尚未完全明确。本研究旨在概述ICD治疗对预防猝死的作用,并确定MVO-HCM患者发生致命性心律失常事件的危险因素。
本研究纳入593例HCM患者。当估计室中隔峰值梯度≥30mmHg时诊断为左心室MVO。
56例患者(9.4%)被诊断为MVO,56例MVO-HCM患者中有15例(26.8%)接受了ICD植入。15例植入ICD的患者中有6例(40.0%)在ICD植入后的6.5±5.1年随访期内接受了适当的ICD干预。尽管42例未植入ICD的患者中有2例猝死,但在转诊至我院后的9.0±8.0年随访期内,植入ICD的患者在随访期间均未发生猝死。多因素分析显示,最大室壁厚度是MVO-HCM患者发生致命性心律失常事件的独立决定因素。
四分之一的MVO-HCM患者接受了ICD植入,适当ICD干预的发生率约为每年6.2%。对于MVO-HCM患者,尤其是左心室肥厚严重的患者,可能有必要仔细考虑预防致命性心律失常事件。