Ann Intern Med. 2016 Jun 21;164(12):787-94. doi: 10.7326/M15-1754. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
Although clinical factors affecting a person's susceptibility to Clostridium difficile infection are well-understood, little is known about what drives differences in incidence across long-term care settings.
To obtain a comprehensive picture of individual and regional factors that affect C difficile incidence.
Multilevel longitudinal nested case-control study.
Veterans Health Administration health care regions, from 2006 through 2012.
Long-term care residents.
Individual-level risk factors included age, number of comorbid conditions, and antibiotic exposure. Regional risk factors included importation of cases of acute care C difficile infection per 10 000 resident-days and antibiotic use per 1000 resident-days. The outcome was defined as a positive result on a long-term care C difficile test without a positive result in the prior 8 weeks.
6012 cases (incidence, 3.7 cases per 10 000 resident-days) were identified in 86 regions. Long-term care C difficile incidence (minimum, 0.6 case per 10 000 resident-days; maximum, 31.0 cases per 10 000 resident-days), antibiotic use (minimum, 61.0 days with therapy per 1000 resident-days; maximum, 370.2 days with therapy per 1000 resident-days), and importation (minimum, 2.9 cases per 10 000 resident-days; maximum, 341.3 cases per 10 000 resident-days) varied substantially across regions. Together, antibiotic use and importation accounted for 75% of the regional variation in C difficile incidence (R2 = 0.75). Multilevel analyses showed that regional factors affected risk together with individual-level exposures (relative risk of regional antibiotic use, 1.36 per doubling [95% CI, 1.15 to 1.60]; relative risk of importation, 1.23 per doubling [CI, 1.14 to 1.33]).
Case identification was based on laboratory criteria. Admission of residents with recent C difficile infection from non-Veterans Health Administration acute care sources was not considered.
Only 25% of the variation in regional C difficile incidence in long-term care remained unexplained after importation from acute care facilities and antibiotic use were accounted for, which suggests that improved infection control and antimicrobial stewardship may help reduce the incidence of C difficile in long-term care settings.
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
虽然人们对影响艰难梭菌感染易感性的临床因素已有较深入的了解,但对于导致长期护理机构发病率差异的因素知之甚少。
全面了解影响艰难梭菌发病率的个体和地区因素。
多水平纵向嵌套病例对照研究。
退伍军人事务部医疗保健区,2006 年至 2012 年。
长期护理居民。
个体水平的危险因素包括年龄、合并症数量和抗生素暴露情况。地区危险因素包括每 10000 名居民-天输入的急性护理艰难梭菌感染病例数和每 1000 名居民-天使用的抗生素数。结果定义为长期护理艰难梭菌检测呈阳性而前 8 周内未呈阳性的结果。
在 86 个地区发现了 6012 例病例(发病率为每 10000 名居民 3.7 例)。长期护理艰难梭菌发病率(最低为每 10000 名居民 0.6 例;最高为每 10000 名居民 31.0 例)、抗生素使用(最低为每 1000 名居民 61.0 天的治疗疗程;最高为每 1000 名居民 370.2 天的治疗疗程)和输入(最低为每 10000 名居民 2.9 例;最高为每 10000 名居民 341.3 例)在各地区差异很大。抗生素使用和输入共同解释了艰难梭菌发病率地区差异的 75%(R2=0.75)。多水平分析表明,地区因素与个体水平暴露一起影响风险(地区抗生素使用的相对风险,每增加一倍为 1.36[95%CI,1.15 至 1.60];输入的相对风险,每增加一倍为 1.23[CI,1.14 至 1.33])。
病例识别基于实验室标准。未考虑从退伍军人事务部以外的急性护理机构输入近期艰难梭菌感染的居民入院情况。
在考虑了从急性护理机构输入和抗生素使用后,长期护理机构艰难梭菌发病率的地区差异只有 25%仍无法解释,这表明加强感染控制和抗菌药物管理可能有助于降低长期护理机构中艰难梭菌的发病率。
美国退伍军人事务部和疾病控制与预防中心。