Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Canada.
ICES, Toronto, Canada.
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Mar 1;72(5):836-844. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa124.
Antibiotic use is the strongest modifiable risk factor for the development of Clostridioides difficile infection, but prescribers lack quantitative information on comparative risks of specific antibiotic courses. Our objective was to estimate risks of C. difficile infection associated with receipt of specific antibiotic courses.
We conducted a longitudinal case-cohort analysis representing over 90% of Ontario nursing home residents, between 2012 and 2017. Our primary exposure was days of antibiotic receipt in the prior 90 days. Adjustment covariates included: age, sex, prior emergency department or acute care stay, Charlson comorbidity index, prior C. difficile infection, acid suppressant use, device use, and functional status. We examined incident C. difficile infection, including cases identified within the nursing home, and those identified during subsequent hospital admissions. Adjusted and unadjusted regression models were used to measure risk associated with 5- to 14-day courses of 18 different antibiotics.
We identified 1708 cases of C. difficile infection (1.27 per 100 000 resident-days). Longer antibiotic duration was associated with increased risk: 10- and 14-day courses incurred 12% (adjusted relative risk [ARR] = 1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09, 1.14) and 27% (ARR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.21,1.30) more risk compared to 7-day courses. Among 7-day courses with similar indications: moxifloxacin resulted in 121% more risk than amoxicillin (ARR = 2.21, 95% CI: 1.67, 3.08), ciprofloxacin engendered 89% more risk than nitrofurantoin (ARR = 1.89, 95% CI: 1.45, 2.68), and clindamycin resulted in 112% (ARR = 2.12, 95% CI: 1.32, 3.78) more risk than cloxacillin.
C. difficile infection risk increases with antibiotic duration, and there are wide disparities in risks associated with antibiotic courses used for similar indications.
抗生素的使用是导致艰难梭菌感染的最强可改变的危险因素,但医生缺乏关于特定抗生素疗程相对风险的定量信息。我们的目的是评估接受特定抗生素疗程与艰难梭菌感染相关的风险。
我们进行了一项代表 2012 年至 2017 年期间安大略省 90%以上养老院居民的纵向病例对照分析。我们的主要暴露是前 90 天内使用抗生素的天数。调整的协变量包括:年龄、性别、急诊或急性护理停留史、Charlson 合并症指数、既往艰难梭菌感染、酸抑制剂使用、器械使用和功能状态。我们检查了艰难梭菌感染的发生率,包括在养老院中发现的病例和在随后的住院期间发现的病例。使用调整和未调整的回归模型来测量与 18 种不同抗生素的 5-14 天疗程相关的风险。
我们发现了 1708 例艰难梭菌感染病例(每 100000 名居民天 1.27 例)。抗生素使用时间的延长与风险增加有关:10 天和 14 天疗程的风险分别增加 12%(调整后的相对风险 [ARR] = 1.12,95%置信区间 [CI]:1.09,1.14)和 27%(ARR = 1.27,95% CI:1.21,1.30)与 7 天疗程相比。在具有相似适应症的 7 天疗程中:莫西沙星的风险比阿莫西林高 121%(ARR = 2.21,95% CI:1.67,3.08),环丙沙星的风险比呋喃妥因高 89%(ARR = 1.89,95% CI:1.45,2.68),克林霉素的风险比氯唑西林高 112%(ARR = 2.12,95% CI:1.32,3.78)。
艰难梭菌感染的风险随着抗生素使用时间的增加而增加,并且用于类似适应症的抗生素疗程之间存在很大的风险差异。