Theiss Juliane, Rother Michael, Röske Kerstin
Sächsische Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig, Karl-Tauchnitz-Straße 1, 04107, Leipzig, Germany.
Technische Universität Dresden, Professur für Mikrobielle Diversität, Zellescher Weg 20b, 01217, Dresden, Germany.
Arch Microbiol. 2016 Sep;198(7):619-28. doi: 10.1007/s00203-016-1221-9. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
Various methods are available for DNA isolation from environmental samples. Because the chemical and biological composition of samples such as soil, sludge, or plant material is different, the effectiveness of DNA isolation can vary depending on the method applied and thus, have a substantial effect on the results of downstream analysis of the microbial community. Although the process of biogas formation is being intensely investigated, a systematic evaluation of kits for DNA isolation from material of biogas plants is still lacking. Since no DNA isolation kit specifically tailored for DNA isolation from sludge of biogas plants is available, this study compares five commercially available kits regarding their influence on downstream analyses such denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). The results show that not all kits are equally suited for the DNA isolation from samples of different biogas plants, but highly reproducible DGGE fingerprints as well as qPCR results across the tested samples from biogas reactors using different substrate compositions could be produced using selected kits.
有多种方法可用于从环境样品中分离DNA。由于土壤、污泥或植物材料等样品的化学和生物组成不同,DNA分离的效果可能因所应用的方法而异,从而对微生物群落的下游分析结果产生重大影响。尽管沼气形成过程正在深入研究,但仍缺乏对从沼气厂材料中分离DNA的试剂盒的系统评估。由于没有专门为从沼气厂污泥中分离DNA量身定制的DNA分离试剂盒,本研究比较了五种市售试剂盒对变性梯度凝胶电泳(DGGE)和定量实时PCR(qPCR)等下游分析的影响。结果表明,并非所有试剂盒都同样适用于从不同沼气厂的样品中分离DNA,但使用选定的试剂盒可以在使用不同底物组成的沼气反应器的测试样品中产生高度可重复的DGGE指纹图谱以及qPCR结果。