Austriaco Nicanor Pier Giorgio
Providence College, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
J Med Philos. 2016 Jun;41(3):315-28. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhw008. Epub 2016 Apr 17.
Patrick Lee and Germain Grisez have argued that the total brain dead patient is still dead because the integrated entity that remains is not even an animal, not only because he is not sentient but also, and more importantly, because he has lost the radical capacity for sentience. In this essay, written from within and as a contribution to the Catholic philosophical tradition, I respond to Lee and Grisez's argument by proposing that the brain dead patient is still sentient because an animal with an intact but severed spinal cord can still perceive and respond to external stimuli. The brain dead patient is an unconscious sentient organism.
帕特里克·李和热尔曼·格里斯已论证,全脑死亡患者仍算死亡,因为留存下来的整合实体甚至都不是动物,这不仅是因为他没有感觉能力,更重要的是,因为他已丧失了产生感觉的根本能力。在这篇源自天主教哲学传统并作为其贡献的文章中,我回应李和格里斯的论证,提出脑死亡患者仍有感觉能力,因为脊髓完整但已切断的动物仍能感知并对外界刺激做出反应。脑死亡患者是无意识的有感觉的生物体。