Suppr超能文献

对高危人群进行胰腺癌筛查是否具有成本效益?——来自丹麦国家筛查项目的经验。

Is screening for pancreatic cancer in high-risk groups cost-effective? - Experience from a Danish national screening program.

作者信息

Joergensen Maiken Thyregod, Gerdes Anne-Marie, Sorensen Jan, Schaffalitzky de Muckadell Ove, Mortensen Michael Bau

机构信息

Vejle Hospital, Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

Juliane Marie Centret, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Pancreatology. 2016 Jul-Aug;16(4):584-92. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2016.03.013. Epub 2016 Mar 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer death worldwide, symptoms are few and diffuse, and when the diagnosis has been made only 10-15% would benefit from resection. Surgery is the only potentially curable treatment for pancreatic cancer, and the prognosis seems to improve with early detection. A hereditary component has been identified in 1-10% of the PC cases. To comply with this, screening for PC in high-risk groups with a genetic disposition for PC has been recommended in research settings.

DESIGN

Between January 2006 and February 2014 31 patients with Hereditary pancreatitis or with a disposition of HP and 40 first-degree relatives of patients with Familial Pancreatic Cancer (FPC) were screened for development of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with yearly endoscopic ultrasound. The cost-effectiveness of screening in comparison with no-screening was assessed by the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICER).

RESULTS

By screening the FPC group we identified 2 patients with PDAC who were treated by total pancreatectomy. One patient is still alive, while the other died after 7 months due to cardiac surgery complications. Stratified analysis of patients with HP and FPC provided ICERs of 47,156 US$ vs. 35,493 US$ per life-year and 58,647 US$ vs. 47,867 US$ per QALY. Including only PDAC related death changed the ICER to 31,722 US$ per life-year and 42,128 US$ per QALY. The ICER for patients with FPC was estimated at 28,834 US$ per life-year and 38,785 US$ per QALY.

CONCLUSIONS

With a threshold value of 50,000 US$ per QALY this screening program appears to constitute a cost-effective intervention although screening of HP patients appears to be less cost-effective than FPC patients.

摘要

目的

胰腺癌(PC)是全球第四大致癌死亡原因,症状较少且不具特异性,确诊时仅有10 - 15%的患者可通过手术切除获益。手术是胰腺癌唯一可能治愈的治疗方法,早期发现似乎可改善预后。已在1 - 10%的胰腺癌病例中发现遗传因素。因此,在研究环境中,建议对有胰腺癌遗传倾向的高危人群进行胰腺癌筛查。

设计

2006年1月至2014年2月期间,对31例遗传性胰腺炎患者或有遗传性胰腺炎倾向的患者以及40例家族性胰腺癌(FPC)患者的一级亲属进行筛查,每年通过内镜超声检查是否发生胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)。通过增量成本效益比(ICER)评估筛查与不筛查相比的成本效益。

结果

通过对FPC组进行筛查,我们发现2例PDAC患者接受了全胰切除术治疗。1例患者仍存活,另1例在7个月后因心脏手术并发症死亡。对遗传性胰腺炎患者和FPC患者的分层分析显示,每生命年的ICER分别为47,156美元和35,493美元,每质量调整生命年(QALY)的ICER分别为58,647美元和47,867美元。仅纳入与PDAC相关的死亡病例后,每生命年的ICER变为31,722美元,每QALY的ICER变为42,128美元。FPC患者的ICER估计为每生命年28,834美元,每QALY为38,785美元。

结论

以每QALY 50,000美元的阈值来看,该筛查项目似乎是一种具有成本效益的干预措施,尽管对遗传性胰腺炎患者的筛查似乎不如对FPC患者的筛查那样具有成本效益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验