a Department of Psychology , York University , Toronto , Ontario , Canada.
Psychother Res. 2017 Nov;27(6):724-736. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2016.1158432. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
to design and pilot a reliable observer-based scale of client reflexivity that can be used on short segments of time ("coding intervals") across therapy sessions. Reflexivity was defined as the level of a client's awareness and exploration of his or her interiority. Interiority was defined as thoughts, feelings, sensations, intentions, and desires.
The Client Reflexivity Scale (CRS) was designed through the coding of public access therapy videos featuring demonstrations of therapy. Along with the Experiencing Scale, the CRS was then piloted on one good outcome and one poor outcome session of cognitive-behavioural therapy for anxiety. Each session of therapy featured the same therapist but different clients. Two raters coded the sessions.
Weighted kappas for inter-rater reliability ranged from 0.74 to 0.81. The level of reflexivity was significantly higher in the good outcome session than the poor outcome session, though the trajectory of reflexivity for both sessions was the same. The CRS was also compared to the Experiencing Scale in order to determine similarities and differences between the scales.
the CRS reliably measured reflexivity within the therapy sessions, and in the future can be layered with other process measures in order to map interactions across therapy sessions.
设计并试行一种可靠的基于观察者的客户反思量表,该量表可用于治疗过程中的短时间段(“编码间隔”)。反思被定义为客户对其内在性的意识和探索程度。内在性被定义为思想、感受、感觉、意图和欲望。
通过对公开获取的治疗视频进行编码,展示治疗过程,设计了客户反思量表(CRS)。与体验量表一起,CRS 随后在认知行为疗法治疗焦虑的一次良好结果和一次不良结果的治疗中进行了试行。每次治疗都有同一位治疗师,但不同的客户。两位评分员对治疗进行了编码。
评分者间信度的加权 Kappa 值范围为 0.74 至 0.81。在良好结果的治疗中,反思水平显著高于不良结果的治疗,但两次治疗的反思轨迹是相同的。还将 CRS 与体验量表进行了比较,以确定这两个量表之间的相似之处和差异。
CRS 在治疗过程中可靠地测量了反思,并且在未来可以与其他过程测量方法结合使用,以绘制治疗过程中的相互作用。