Turinawe Emmanueil B
University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
Rural Remote Health. 2016 Apr-Jun;16(2):3856. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
With the renewed call for community participation in health interventions after the Alma Ata Declaration, interest has been raised in volunteer community health workers (CHWs) acting as representatives of local communities. The present study interrogates the dynamic interface between local communities and the government in the selection of CHW volunteers in a rural community.
Data were collected through participant observation of community events, 35 in-depth interviews, 20 focus groups and 15 informal conversations. A review of documents about Luwero district was also an important source of data.
Ambiguous national guidelines and poor supervision of the selection process enabled the powerful community leaders to influence the selection of village health teams (VHTs). Intended to achieve community involvement, the selection process produced a disconnect in the local community where many members saw the selected VHTs as having been 'taken away'.
Community involvement in the selection of VHTs took a form that, instead of empowering the local community, reinforced the responsibility of those in power and thus maintained the asymmetrical status quo.
在《阿拉木图宣言》之后,人们再次呼吁社区参与健康干预措施,这引发了对作为当地社区代表的志愿社区卫生工作者(CHWs)的兴趣。本研究探讨了农村社区在选择社区卫生工作者志愿者时当地社区与政府之间的动态关系。
通过对社区活动的参与观察、35次深入访谈、20次焦点小组讨论和15次非正式谈话收集数据。对卢韦罗区相关文件的审查也是重要的数据来源。
国家指导方针不明确以及对选拔过程的监督不力,使得有影响力的社区领袖能够影响村庄卫生团队(VHTs)的选拔。旨在实现社区参与的选拔过程在当地社区造成了脱节,许多成员认为被选中的村庄卫生团队是被“夺走”的。
社区参与村庄卫生团队的选拔采取了一种形式,这种形式非但没有增强当地社区的权能,反而强化了掌权者的责任,从而维持了不对称的现状。