Apel Kenn, Henbest Victoria Suzanne
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2016 Apr 1;47(2):148-56. doi: 10.1044/2016_LSHSS-15-0050.
We examined grade-level differences in 1st- through 3rd-grade students' performance on an experimenter-developed affix meaning task (AMT) and determined whether AMT performance explained unique variance in word-level reading and reading comprehension, beyond other known contributors to reading development.
Forty students at each grade level completed an assessment battery that included measures of phonological awareness, receptive vocabulary, word-level reading, reading comprehension, and affix meaning knowledge.
On the AMT, 1st-grade students were significantly less accurate than 2nd- and 3rd-grade students; there was no significant difference in performance between the 2nd- and 3rd-grade students. Regression analyses revealed that the AMT accounted for 8% unique variance of students' performance on word-level reading measures and 6% unique variance of students' performance on the reading comprehension measure, after age, phonological awareness, and receptive vocabulary were explained.
These results provide initial information on the development of affix meaning knowledge via an explicit measure in 1st- through 3rd-grade students and demonstrate that affix meaning knowledge uniquely contributes to the development of reading abilities above other known literacy predictors. These findings provide empirical support for how students might use morphological problem solving to read unknown multimorphemic words successfully.
我们研究了一至三年级学生在实验者编制的词缀意义任务(AMT)中的年级差异,并确定了AMT表现是否能解释单词层面阅读和阅读理解中独特的方差,这超出了其他已知的阅读发展影响因素。
每个年级的40名学生完成了一套评估测试,包括语音意识、接受性词汇、单词层面阅读、阅读理解和词缀意义知识的测量。
在AMT上,一年级学生的准确率显著低于二年级和三年级学生;二年级和三年级学生的表现没有显著差异。回归分析显示,在解释了年龄、语音意识和接受性词汇之后,AMT在单词层面阅读测量中占学生表现独特方差的8%,在阅读理解测量中占学生表现独特方差的6%。
这些结果通过对一至三年级学生的明确测量,提供了关于词缀意义知识发展的初步信息,并表明词缀意义知识对阅读能力发展的独特贡献超过了其他已知的读写预测因素。这些发现为学生如何利用形态学问题解决方法成功阅读未知的多语素单词提供了实证支持。