Vasconcelos-Moreno Mirela P, Bücker Joana, Bürke Kelen P, Czepielewski Leticia, Santos Barbara T, Fijtman Adam, Passos Ives C, Kunz Mauricio, Bonnín Caterina Del Mar, Vieta Eduard, Kapczinski Flavio, Rosa Adriane R, Kauer-Sant'Anna Marcia
Programa de Transtorno Bipolar, Laboratório de Psiquiatria Molecular, Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia Translacional em Medicina (INCT-TM), Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psiquiatria, UFRGS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Braz J Psychiatry. 2016 Oct-Dec;38(4):275-280. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2015-1868. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
: To assess cognitive performance and psychosocial functioning in patients with bipolar disorder (BD), in unaffected siblings, and in healthy controls.
: Subjects were patients with BD (n=36), unaffected siblings (n=35), and healthy controls (n=44). Psychosocial functioning was accessed using the Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST). A sub-group of patients with BD (n=21), unaffected siblings (n=14), and healthy controls (n=22) also underwent a battery of neuropsychological tests: California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT), Stroop Color and Word Test, and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). Clinical and sociodemographic characteristics were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance or the chi-square test; multivariate analysis of covariance was used to examine differences in neuropsychological variables.
: Patients with BD showed higher FAST total scores (23.90±11.35) than healthy controls (5.86±5.47; p < 0.001) and siblings (12.60±11.83; p 0.001). Siblings and healthy controls also showed statistically significant differences in FAST total scores (p = 0.008). Patients performed worse than healthy controls on all CVLT sub-tests (p < 0.030) and in the number of correctly completed categories on WCST (p = 0.030). Siblings did not differ from healthy controls in cognitive tests.
: Unaffected siblings of patients with BD may show poorer functional performance compared to healthy controls. FAST scores may contribute to the development of markers of vulnerability and endophenotypic traits in at-risk populations.
评估双相情感障碍(BD)患者、未患病的同胞以及健康对照者的认知表现和心理社会功能。
研究对象包括BD患者(n = 36)、未患病的同胞(n = 35)和健康对照者(n = 44)。使用功能评估简短测试(FAST)评估心理社会功能。BD患者亚组(n = 21)、未患病的同胞亚组(n = 14)和健康对照者亚组(n = 22)还接受了一系列神经心理学测试:加利福尼亚言语学习测试(CVLT)、斯特鲁普颜色和文字测试以及威斯康星卡片分类测试(WCST)。采用单因素方差分析或卡方检验分析临床和社会人口学特征;使用协方差多元分析检验神经心理学变量的差异。
BD患者的FAST总分(23.90±11.35)高于健康对照者(5.86±5.47;p < 0.001)和同胞(12.60±11.83;p < 0.001)。同胞和健康对照者在FAST总分上也存在统计学显著差异(p = 0.008)。在所有CVLT子测试中,患者的表现均比健康对照者差(p < 0.030),且在WCST中正确完成的类别数量上也较差(p = 0.030)。同胞在认知测试中与健康对照者没有差异。
与健康对照者相比,BD患者未患病的同胞可能表现出较差的功能表现。FAST评分可能有助于在高危人群中开发易感性和内表型特征的标志物。