Sun Delin, Lee Tatia M C, Wang Zhaoxin, Chan Chetwyn C H
Laboratory of Neuropsychology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Laboratory of Cognitive Affective Neuroscience, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 20;11(4):e0153660. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153660. eCollection 2016.
To understand the neural processing that underpins dishonest behavior in an economic exchange game task, this study employed both functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and event-related potential (ERP) methodologies to examine the neural conditions of 25 participants while they were making either dishonest or honest choices. It was discovered that dishonest choices, contrary to honest choices, elicited stronger fMRI activations in bilateral striatum and anterior insula. It also induced fluctuations in ERP amplitudes within two time windows, which are 270-30 milliseconds before and 110-290 milliseconds after the response, respectively. Importantly, when making either dishonest or honest choices, human and computer counterparts were associated with distinct fMRI activations in the left insula and different ERP amplitudes at medial and right central sites from 80 milliseconds before to 250 milliseconds after the response. These results support the hypothesis that there would be distinct neural processing during making dishonest decisions, especially when the subject considers the interests of the counterpart. Furthermore, the fMRI and ERP findings, together with ERP source reconstruction, clearly delineate the temporal sequence of the neural processes of a dishonest decision: the striatum is activated before response, then the left insula is involved around the time of response, and finally the thalamus is activated after response.
为了解经济交换博弈任务中不诚实行为背后的神经处理过程,本研究采用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)和事件相关电位(ERP)方法,在25名参与者做出不诚实或诚实选择时,检测其神经状况。研究发现,与诚实选择相反,不诚实选择在双侧纹状体和前脑岛引发了更强的fMRI激活。它还在两个时间窗口内诱发了ERP振幅的波动,分别在反应前270 - 30毫秒和反应后110 - 290毫秒。重要的是,在做出不诚实或诚实选择时,人与计算机对手在左脑岛的fMRI激活以及反应前80毫秒到反应后250毫秒期间内侧和右侧中央部位的ERP振幅不同。这些结果支持了这样一种假设,即在做出不诚实决策时会有不同的神经处理过程,尤其是当受试者考虑对手的利益时。此外,fMRI和ERP的研究结果,以及ERP源重建,清楚地描绘了不诚实决策神经过程的时间顺序:纹状体在反应前被激活,然后在反应时左脑岛参与其中,最后丘脑在反应后被激活。