Vegetation Restoration and Management of Degraded Ecosystems and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510650, China.
Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, 1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Nov;22(11):3608-3620. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13327. Epub 2016 May 14.
The effects of increased reactive nitrogen (N) deposition in forests depend largely on its fate in the ecosystems. However, our knowledge on the fates of deposited N in tropical forest ecosystems and its retention mechanisms is limited. Here, we report the results from the first whole ecosystem N labeling experiment performed in a N-rich old-growth tropical forest in southern China. We added N tracer monthly as NH NO for 1 year to control plots and to N-fertilized plots (N-plots, receiving additions of 50 kg N ha yr for 10 years). Tracer recoveries in major ecosystem compartments were quantified 4 months after the last addition. Tracer recoveries in soil solution were monitored monthly to quantify leaching losses. Total tracer recovery in plant and soil (N retention) in the control plots was 72% and similar to those observed in temperate forests. The retention decreased to 52% in the N-plots. Soil was the dominant sink, retaining 37% and 28% of the labeled N input in the control and N-plots, respectively. Leaching below 20 cm was 50 kg N ha yr in the control plots and was close to the N input (51 kg N ha yr ), indicating N saturation of the top soil. Nitrogen addition increased N leaching to 73 kg N ha yr . However, of these only 7 and 23 kg N ha yr in the control and N-plots, respectively, originated from the labeled N input. Our findings indicate that deposited N, like in temperate forests, is largely incorporated into plant and soil pools in the short term, although the forest is N-saturated, but high cycling rates may later release the N for leaching and/or gaseous loss. Thus, N cycling rates rather than short-term N retention represent the main difference between temperate forests and the studied tropical forest.
增加森林中活性氮(N)沉积的影响在很大程度上取决于其在生态系统中的归宿。然而,我们对于热带森林生态系统中沉积 N 的归宿及其保留机制的认识是有限的。在这里,我们报告了首次在中国南方富氮的古老热带森林中进行的整个生态系统 15N 标记实验的结果。我们每月以 NH4NO3 的形式向对照区和 N 施肥区(N 施肥区,10 年来每年添加 50kg N/ha)添加 15N 示踪剂。末次添加后 4 个月,定量了主要生态系统区系中示踪剂的回收率。每月监测土壤溶液中的示踪回收率,以量化淋溶损失。对照区植物和土壤(N 保留)中的总示踪回收率为 72%,与温带森林观察到的相似。在 N 施肥区,保留率下降到 52%。土壤是主要的汇,分别保留对照区和 N 施肥区输入示踪 N 的 37%和 28%。对照区 20cm 以下的淋溶量为 50kg N/ha,与输入量(51kg N/ha)相近,表明表土达到 N 饱和。氮添加增加了 N 的淋溶量,达到 73kg N/ha。然而,这些淋溶 N 中只有 7kg 和 23kg N/ha 分别来自输入的示踪 N。我们的研究结果表明,与温带森林一样,沉积 N 在短期内大量被纳入植物和土壤库中,尽管森林已经达到 N 饱和,但高循环速率可能会导致随后的 N 淋失和/或气态损失。因此,N 循环速率而不是短期 N 保留代表了温带森林和研究热带森林之间的主要区别。