Schrijvers LieSbeth H, Beijlevelt-van der Zande Marlene, Peters Marjolein, Lock Janske, Cnossen Marjon H, Schuurmans Marieke J, Fischer Kathelijn
Van Creveldkliniek, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Haemophilia Treatment Centre, Emma Children's' Hospital- Academical Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Br J Haematol. 2016 Aug;174(3):454-60. doi: 10.1111/bjh.14072. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
Prevention of bleeding and joint damage in severe haemophilia is dependent on adherence to prophylactic replacement therapy. The aim of this study was to assess adherence to prophylaxis, including associations with age, bleeding and clotting factor consumption (CFC). In three Dutch haemophilia centres, semi-structured interviews about adherence to prophylaxis in the previous 2 weeks were conducted with patients or parents of a child with haemophilia. Patients were classified, according to pre-specified definitions, as adherent, sub-optimally adherent or non-adherent based on missing, timing, and dose of infusions. Association of annual bleeding rates, mean CFC, person performing the infusion (parents verus patients) with adherence categories were analysed. Overall, 241 patients with haemophilia using prophylaxis were studied. Parents were more adherent (66%; n = 48/73) than patients (43%; n = 72/168). Sub-optimal adherence occurred in 29% of parents and 37% of patients and was characterized by changes in timing of infusion (mostly from morning to evening), while missing <6% of infusions. Non-adherence occurred less often: in 5% of parents and 20% of patients. Reduced adherence was associated with lower CFC, but not with joint bleeding. In conclusion, non-adherence in haemophilia was relatively rare, yet 1/3 of patients struggled to administer prophylaxis at the appropriate time of day.
重度血友病患者出血和关节损伤的预防取决于对预防性替代疗法的依从性。本研究旨在评估对预防治疗的依从性,包括与年龄、出血及凝血因子消耗量(CFC)的相关性。在荷兰的三个血友病中心,对血友病患者或患儿家长进行了关于过去2周预防治疗依从性的半结构化访谈。根据预先设定的定义,依据输注的缺失情况、时间安排和剂量,将患者分为依从、次优依从或不依从。分析了年出血率、平均CFC、进行输注的人员(家长与患者)与依从性类别之间的关联。总体而言,共研究了241例接受预防治疗的血友病患者。家长的依从性(66%;n = 48/73)高于患者(43%;n = 72/168)。29%的家长和37%的患者存在次优依从性,其特征为输注时间改变(大多从早晨改为晚上),同时输注缺失<6%。不依从情况较少见:5%的家长和20%的患者存在不依从。依从性降低与较低的CFC相关,但与关节出血无关。总之,血友病患者的不依从情况相对少见,但仍有1/3的患者在一天中的适当时间难以进行预防治疗。