• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

行业资助的心血管试验的临床试验数据可用性。

Availability of Clinical Trial Data From Industry-Sponsored Cardiovascular Trials.

作者信息

Murugiah Karthik, Ritchie Jessica D, Desai Nihar R, Ross Joseph S, Krumholz Harlan M

机构信息

Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.

Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Apr 20;5(4):e003307. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003307.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.116.003307
PMID:27098969
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4859296/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Industry-sponsored clinical trials produce high-quality data sets that can be used by researchers to generate new knowledge. We assessed the availability of individual participant-level data (IPD) from large cardiovascular trials conducted by major pharmaceutical companies and compiled a list of available trials.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We identified all randomized cardiovascular interventional trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with >5000 enrollment, sponsored by 1 of the top 20 pharmaceutical companies by 2014 global sales. Availability of IPD for each trial was ascertained by searching each company's website/data-sharing portal. If availability could not be determined, each company was contacted electronically. Of 60 included trials, IPD are available for 15 trials (25%) consisting of 204 452 patients. IPD are unavailable for 15 trials (25%). Reasons for unavailability were: cosponsor did not agree to make IPD available (4 trials) and trials were not conducted within a specific time (5 trials); for the remaining 6 trials, no specific reason was provided. For 30 trials (50%), availability of IPD could not be definitively determined either because of no response or requirements for a full proposal (23 trials).

CONCLUSIONS

IPD from 1 in 4 large cardiovascular trials conducted by major pharmaceutical companies are confirmed available to researchers for secondary research, a valuable opportunity to enhance science. However, IPD from 1 in 4 trials are not available, and data availability could not be definitively determined for half of our sample. For several of these trials, companies require a full proposal to determine availability, making use of the IPD by researchers less certain.

摘要

背景

行业资助的临床试验可产生高质量数据集,供研究人员用于生成新知识。我们评估了大型心血管试验中主要制药公司开展的个体参与者水平数据(IPD)的可获取性,并编制了一份可用试验清单。

方法与结果

我们识别了在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册的、入组人数超过5000且由2014年全球销售额排名前20的制药公司之一资助的所有随机心血管介入试验。通过搜索每家公司的网站/数据共享门户来确定每项试验的IPD可获取性。如果无法确定可获取性,则通过电子邮件联系每家公司。在纳入的60项试验中,有15项试验(25%)可获取IPD,涉及204452名患者。15项试验(25%)无法获取IPD。无法获取的原因包括:共同资助方不同意提供IPD(4项试验)以及试验并非在特定时间内开展(5项试验);其余6项试验未给出具体原因。对于30项试验(50%),由于未得到回复或需要完整提案(23项试验),无法明确确定IPD的可获取性。

结论

主要制药公司开展的四分之一大型心血管试验的IPD已确认可供研究人员进行二次研究,这是提升科学水平的宝贵机会。然而,四分之一试验的IPD无法获取,并且我们样本中一半试验的数据可获取性无法明确确定。对于其中一些试验,公司要求提供完整提案来确定可获取性,这使得研究人员利用IPD的情况更不确定。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c2/4859296/f8609d680a26/JAH3-5-e003307-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c2/4859296/f8609d680a26/JAH3-5-e003307-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c2/4859296/f8609d680a26/JAH3-5-e003307-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Availability of Clinical Trial Data From Industry-Sponsored Cardiovascular Trials.行业资助的心血管试验的临床试验数据可用性。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Apr 20;5(4):e003307. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003307.
2
Audit of Data Sharing by Pharmaceutical Companies for Anticancer Medicines Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration.美国食品和药物管理局批准的抗癌药物的制药公司的数据共享审核。
JAMA Oncol. 2022 Sep 1;8(9):1310-1316. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.2867.
3
Data sharing from pharmaceutical industry sponsored clinical studies: audit of data availability.制药业资助的临床研究数据共享:数据可获得性审计。
BMC Med. 2018 Sep 28;16(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1154-z.
4
Heterogeneity and Utility of Pharmaceutical Company Sharing of Individual-Participant Data Packages.制药公司分享个体参与者数据包的异质性和效用。
JAMA Oncol. 2023 Dec 1;9(12):1621-1626. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.3996.
5
Sharing of clinical trial data and results reporting practices among large pharmaceutical companies: cross sectional descriptive study and pilot of a tool to improve company practices.大型制药公司临床试验数据共享和结果报告实践情况:改善公司实践的工具的横断面描述性研究和试点。
BMJ. 2019 Jul 10;366:l4217. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4217.
6
Retrieval barriers in individual participant data reviews with network meta-analysis.个体参与者数据综述中的检索障碍与网络荟萃分析。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2023 Apr;28(2):119-125. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112024. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
7
Obtaining and managing data sets for individual participant data meta-analysis: scoping review and practical guide.个体参与者数据荟萃分析中获取和管理数据集:范围综述与实用指南。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 May 12;20(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-00964-6.
8
Data sharing: experience of accessing individual patient data from completed randomised controlled trials in vascular and cognitive medicine.数据共享:从已完成的血管与认知医学随机对照试验中获取个体患者数据的经验
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 9;10(9):e038765. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038765.
9
Primed to comply: Individual participant data sharing statements on ClinicalTrials.gov.准备遵守:ClinicalTrials.gov 上的个体参与者数据共享声明。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 18;15(2):e0226143. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226143. eCollection 2020.
10
COVID-19 trials were not more likely to report intent to share individual data than non-COVID-19 trials in ClinicalTrials.gov.在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上,COVID-19 试验比非 COVID-19 试验更不可能报告分享个体数据的意向。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Jun;158:10-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.03.015. Epub 2023 Mar 24.

引用本文的文献

1
The state of individual participant data sharing for the highest-revenue medicines.收入最高药品的个体参与者数据共享状况。
Clin Trials. 2025 Apr;22(2):170-177. doi: 10.1177/17407745241286147. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
2
A 10-year update to the principles for clinical trial data sharing by pharmaceutical companies: perspectives based on a decade of literature and policies.制药公司临床试验数据共享原则的 10 年更新:基于十年文献和政策的观点。
BMC Med. 2023 Oct 23;21(1):400. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-03113-0.
3
Status, use and impact of sharing individual participant data from clinical trials: a scoping review.

本文引用的文献

1
Alternative calculations of individual patient time in therapeutic range while taking warfarin: results from the ROCKET AF trial.服用华法林时个体患者处于治疗范围内时间的替代计算方法:ROCKET AF试验结果
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Mar 3;4(3):e001349. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001349.
2
Statin therapy and risk of fracture: results from the JUPITER randomized clinical trial.他汀类药物治疗与骨折风险:JUPITER 随机临床试验结果。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Feb;175(2):171-7. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.6388.
3
Open access to clinical trials data.
临床试验个体参与者数据共享的现状、使用和影响:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 18;11(8):e049228. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049228.
4
Clinical trial transparency and data sharing among biopharmaceutical companies and the role of company size, location and product type: a cross-sectional descriptive analysis.生物制药公司临床试验透明度和数据共享,以及公司规模、地点和产品类型的作用:一项横断面描述性分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 19;11(7):e053248. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053248.
5
PRIME-IPD SERIES Part 1. The PRIME-IPD tool promoted verification and standardization of study datasets retrieved for IPD meta-analysis.PRIME-IPD 系列第 1 部分。PRIME-IPD 工具促进了为 IPD 荟萃分析检索的研究数据集的验证和标准化。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Aug;136:227-234. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.05.007. Epub 2021 May 24.
6
Obtaining and managing data sets for individual participant data meta-analysis: scoping review and practical guide.个体参与者数据荟萃分析中获取和管理数据集:范围综述与实用指南。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 May 12;20(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-00964-6.
7
Perspective on Data-Sharing Requirements for the Necessary Evolution of Drug Development.药物研发必要发展的数据共享要求透视
J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Jun;60(6):688-690. doi: 10.1002/jcph.1607. Epub 2020 Mar 28.
8
Sharing of clinical trial data and results reporting practices among large pharmaceutical companies: cross sectional descriptive study and pilot of a tool to improve company practices.大型制药公司临床试验数据共享和结果报告实践情况:改善公司实践的工具的横断面描述性研究和试点。
BMJ. 2019 Jul 10;366:l4217. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4217.
9
Data sharing from pharmaceutical industry sponsored clinical studies: audit of data availability.制药业资助的临床研究数据共享:数据可获得性审计。
BMC Med. 2018 Sep 28;16(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1154-z.
10
The Open Translational Science in Schizophrenia (OPTICS) project: an open-science project bringing together Janssen clinical trial and NIMH data.精神分裂症开放转化科学(OPTICS)项目:一个汇集杨森临床试验和美国国立精神卫生研究所数据的开放科学项目。
NPJ Schizophr. 2018 Jun 27;4(1):14. doi: 10.1038/s41537-018-0055-7.
临床试验数据的开放获取。
JAMA. 2014 Sep 10;312(10):1002-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.9647.
4
Sea change in open science and data sharing: leadership by industry.开放科学与数据共享的巨变:行业引领
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014 Jul;7(4):499-504. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001166.
5
Discontinuation of antiplatelet study medication and risk of recurrent stroke and cardiovascular events: results from the PRoFESS study.停用抗血小板研究药物与复发性卒中及心血管事件风险:来自 PROFESS 研究的结果。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;35(6):538-43. doi: 10.1159/000351144. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
6
Ushering in a new era of open science through data sharing: the wall must come down.通过数据共享迎来开放科学的新时代:必须推倒这堵墙。
JAMA. 2013 Apr 3;309(13):1355-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.1299.
7
The importance of clinical trial data sharing: toward more open science.临床试验数据共享的重要性:迈向更开放的科学。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Mar 1;5(2):238-40. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.965798.