Greenlee Heather, Molmenti Christine L Sardo, Crew Katherine D, Awad Danielle, Kalinsky Kevin, Brafman Lois, Fuentes Deborah, Shi Zaixing, Tsai Wei-Yann, Neugut Alfred I, Hershman Dawn L
Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 W. 168th Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
J Cancer Surviv. 2016 Dec;10(6):956-963. doi: 10.1007/s11764-016-0541-8. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
The effectiveness of survivorship care plans has not been widely tested. We evaluated whether a one-time brief lifestyle consultation as part of a broader survivorship care plan was effective at changing diet and lifestyle patterns.
A diverse sample of women with stage 0-III breast cancer were randomized to control or intervention groups within 6 weeks of completing adjuvant treatment. Both groups received the National Cancer Institute publication, "Facing Forward: Life after Cancer Treatment." The intervention group also met with a nurse (1 h) and a nutritionist (1 h) to receive personalized lifestyle recommendations based upon national guidelines. Diet, lifestyle, and perceived health were assessed at baseline, 3 and 6 months. Linear regression analyses evaluated the effects of the intervention adjusted for covariates.
A total of 126 women completed the study (60 control/66 intervention, 61 Hispanic/65 non-Hispanic). At 3 months, the intervention group reported greater knowledge of a healthy diet (P = 0.047), importance of physical activity (P = 0.03), and appropriate use of dietary supplements (P = 0.006) and reported lower frequency of alcohol drinking (P = 0.03) than controls. At 6 months, only greater knowledge of a healthy diet (P = 0.01) persisted. The intervention was more effective among non-Hispanics than Hispanics on improving attitude towards healthy eating (P = 0.03) and frequency of physical activity (P = 0.006).
The intervention changed lifestyle behaviors and knowledge in the short-term, but the benefits did not persist.
Culturally competent long-term behavioral interventions should be tested beyond the survivorship care plan to facilitate long-term behavior change among breast cancer survivors.
生存护理计划的有效性尚未得到广泛测试。我们评估了作为更广泛生存护理计划一部分的一次性简短生活方式咨询在改变饮食和生活方式模式方面是否有效。
在完成辅助治疗的6周内,将不同阶段0 - III期乳腺癌女性的多样样本随机分为对照组或干预组。两组均收到美国国立癌症研究所的出版物《向前看:癌症治疗后的生活》。干预组还与一名护士(1小时)和一名营养师(1小时)会面,以根据国家指南获得个性化的生活方式建议。在基线、3个月和6个月时评估饮食、生活方式和感知健康状况。线性回归分析评估了调整协变量后的干预效果。
共有126名女性完成了研究(60名对照组/66名干预组,61名西班牙裔/65名非西班牙裔)。在3个月时,干预组报告对健康饮食的了解更多(P = 0.047),认识到体育活动的重要性(P = 0.03),以及正确使用膳食补充剂的情况更多(P = 0.006),并且报告饮酒频率低于对照组(P = 0.03)。在6个月时,只有对健康饮食的更多了解(P = 0.01)仍然存在。在改善对健康饮食的态度(P = 0.03)和体育活动频率(P = 0.006)方面,干预对非西班牙裔的效果比对西班牙裔更显著。
该干预在短期内改变了生活方式行为和知识,但益处并未持续。
应在生存护理计划之外测试具有文化适应性的长期行为干预措施,以促进乳腺癌幸存者的长期行为改变。