• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

去甲肾上腺素输注泵更换期间血流动力学不稳定的预测因素。

Predictors of haemodynamic instability during the changeover of norepinephrine infusion pumps.

作者信息

Cour Martin, Bénet Thomas, Hernu Romain, Simon Marie, Baudry Thomas, Vanhems Philippe, Argaud Laurent

机构信息

Service de Réanimation Médicale, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, 69437, Lyon, France.

Faculté de médecine Lyon-Est, Université Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, 69008, Lyon, France.

出版信息

Ann Intensive Care. 2016 Dec;6(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13613-016-0139-3. Epub 2016 Apr 22.

DOI:10.1186/s13613-016-0139-3
PMID:27101830
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4840124/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Changeovers of norepinephrine infusion pumps (CNIPs) frequently lead to haemodynamic instability. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for haemodynamic instability associated with CNIP, independent of the method used to perform the relay.

METHODS

We performed a prospective study, in a university-affiliated intensive care unit. Over a 1-year period, all adult patients who had at least one CNIP were included. CNIPs were automatically performed using smart pumps, in accordance with a standardised protocol. CNIP-induced haemodynamic instability was defined as a variation in mean arterial pressure (MAP) >25 %. A multivariate mixed effects logistic regression was fitted to assess the factors associated with CNIP-induced haemodynamic instability.

RESULTS

From the 118 patients included in the study, 764 CNIPs were analysed. Most of the patients were treated with norepinephrine for septic shock of medical origin (n = 83, 70 %). Haemodynamic instability occurred 114 times (15 %) in 63 patients (53 %). Among the risk factors identified by the univariate analysis (age, heart rate, dose of norepinephrine infused, and change in the concentration of the vasoactive drug; p < 0.05), change in the norepinephrine concentration was the only independent risk factor for CNIP-induced haemodynamic instability identified in the multivariate analysis (adjusted OR 11.8, 95 % CI 7.2-19.5, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in the norepinephrine concentration during CNIPs lead to a high risk of haemodynamic instability, while the clinical severity of patients, as well as the doses of norepinephrine, was not.

摘要

背景

去甲肾上腺素输注泵的更换(CNIP)常常导致血流动力学不稳定。本研究的目的是确定与CNIP相关的血流动力学不稳定的危险因素,而不考虑进行接力的方法。

方法

我们在一所大学附属医院的重症监护病房进行了一项前瞻性研究。在1年的时间里,纳入了所有至少有一次CNIP的成年患者。CNIP根据标准化方案使用智能泵自动进行。CNIP引起的血流动力学不稳定定义为平均动脉压(MAP)变化>25%。采用多变量混合效应逻辑回归来评估与CNIP引起的血流动力学不稳定相关的因素。

结果

在纳入研究的118例患者中,分析了764次CNIP。大多数患者因医源性感染性休克接受去甲肾上腺素治疗(n = 83,70%)。63例患者(53%)发生血流动力学不稳定114次(15%)。在单变量分析确定的危险因素(年龄、心率、输注的去甲肾上腺素剂量以及血管活性药物浓度的变化;p < 0.05)中,去甲肾上腺素浓度的变化是多变量分析中确定的与CNIP引起的血流动力学不稳定唯一相关的独立危险因素(校正OR 11.8,95%CI 7.2 - 19.5,p < 0.001)。

结论

CNIP期间去甲肾上腺素浓度的变化会导致血流动力学不稳定的高风险,而患者的临床严重程度以及去甲肾上腺素的剂量则不然。

相似文献

1
Predictors of haemodynamic instability during the changeover of norepinephrine infusion pumps.去甲肾上腺素输注泵更换期间血流动力学不稳定的预测因素。
Ann Intensive Care. 2016 Dec;6(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13613-016-0139-3. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
2
Benefits of smart pumps for automated changeovers of vasoactive drug infusion pumps: a quasi-experimental study.智能输液泵在血管活性药物输液泵自动更换中的优势:一项准实验研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2013 Nov;111(5):818-24. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet199. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
3
Automatic versus manual changeovers of norepinephrine infusion pumps in critically ill adults: a prospective controlled study.危重症成年患者中去甲肾上腺素输注泵的自动与手动切换:一项前瞻性对照研究。
Ann Intensive Care. 2015 Dec;5(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13613-015-0083-7. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
4
Minimising haemodynamic lability during changeover of syringes infusing norepinephrine in adult critical care patients: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.在成人重症监护患者更换输注去甲肾上腺素的注射器时,尽量减少血液动力学的不稳定性:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Oct;125(4):622-628. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.06.041. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
5
Effects of norepinephrine plus dobutamine or norepinephrine alone on left ventricular performance of septic shock patients.去甲肾上腺素联合多巴酚丁胺或单独使用去甲肾上腺素对感染性休克患者左心室功能的影响。
Crit Care Med. 1999 Sep;27(9):1708-13. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199909000-00002.
6
Changeovers of vasoactive drug infusion pumps: impact of a quality improvement program.血管活性药物输注泵的更换:质量改进计划的影响
Crit Care. 2007;11(6):R133. doi: 10.1186/cc6209.
7
Effects of short-term simultaneous infusion of dobutamine and terlipressin in patients with septic shock: the DOBUPRESS study.多巴酚丁胺与特利加压素短期同步输注对感染性休克患者的影响:DOBUPRESS研究
Br J Anaesth. 2008 Apr;100(4):494-503. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen017. Epub 2008 Feb 27.
8
Management of septic shock with a norepinephrine-based haemodynamic algorithm.基于去甲肾上腺素的血流动力学算法治疗感染性休克
Resuscitation. 2005 Jul;66(1):63-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.01.009.
9
Management of the changeover of inotrope infusions in children.儿童血管活性药物输注转换的管理。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2004 Oct;20(5):275-80. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2004.06.003.
10
In vitro comparison of two changeover methods for vasoactive drug infusion pumps: quick-change versus automated relay.血管活性药物输注泵两种转换方法的体外比较:快速更换与自动中继。
Biomed Tech (Berl). 2015 Aug;60(4):377-80. doi: 10.1515/bmt-2014-0140.

本文引用的文献

1
Automatic versus manual changeovers of norepinephrine infusion pumps in critically ill adults: a prospective controlled study.危重症成年患者中去甲肾上腺素输注泵的自动与手动切换:一项前瞻性对照研究。
Ann Intensive Care. 2015 Dec;5(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13613-015-0083-7. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
2
Personalizing blood pressure management in septic shock.脓毒性休克中血压管理的个性化
Ann Intensive Care. 2015 Dec;5(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13613-015-0085-5. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
3
In vitro comparison of two changeover methods for vasoactive drug infusion pumps: quick-change versus automated relay.血管活性药物输注泵两种转换方法的体外比较:快速更换与自动中继。
Biomed Tech (Berl). 2015 Aug;60(4):377-80. doi: 10.1515/bmt-2014-0140.
4
An in vitro evaluation of infusion methods using a syringe pump to improve noradrenaline administration.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015 Feb;59(2):197-204. doi: 10.1111/aas.12439. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
5
High versus low blood-pressure target in patients with septic shock.严重脓毒症及脓毒性休克患者的血压目标:高与低之比较
N Engl J Med. 2014 Apr 24;370(17):1583-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1312173. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
6
Benefits of smart pumps for automated changeovers of vasoactive drug infusion pumps: a quasi-experimental study.智能输液泵在血管活性药物输液泵自动更换中的优势:一项准实验研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2013 Nov;111(5):818-24. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet199. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
7
Quick change versus double pump while changing the infusion of inotropes: an experimental study.在更换血管活性药物输注时快速更换与双泵更换的对比:一项实验研究
Nurs Crit Care. 2009 Jul-Aug;14(4):200-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2009.00333.x.
8
Changeovers of vasoactive drug infusion pumps: impact of a quality improvement program.血管活性药物输注泵的更换:质量改进计划的影响
Crit Care. 2007;11(6):R133. doi: 10.1186/cc6209.
9
The delivery of drugs to patients by continuous intravenous infusion: modeling predicts potential dose fluctuations depending on flow rates and infusion system dead volume.通过持续静脉输注向患者给药:模型预测,根据流速和输液系统死腔,可能会出现剂量波动。
Anesth Analg. 2006 Apr;102(4):1147-53. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000198670.02481.6b.
10
A comparison between single and double-pump syringe changes of intravenous inotropic medications in children.
Dynamics. 2004 Winter;15(4):10-4.