Suppr超能文献

使用司维拉姆或钙基磷结合剂治疗的血液透析患者的心外膜脂肪组织体积增加:Renagel用于新透析试验的一项子研究

Epicardial adipose tissue volume increase in hemodialysis patients treated with sevelamer or calcium-based phosphate binders: a substudy of the Renagel in new dialysis trial.

作者信息

Ko Sung Min, Zhang Chao, Chen Zhengjia, D'Marco Luis, Bellasi Antonio, Stillman Arthur E, Block Geoffrey, Raggi Paolo

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, 4-12 Hwayang-dong, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, 143-729, Korea.

Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

J Nephrol. 2016 Oct;29(5):683-90. doi: 10.1007/s40620-016-0310-9. Epub 2016 Apr 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the general population and in hemodialysis patients epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) has been associated with increased mortality and cardiovascular events. Weight loss and lipid lowering therapies reduced EAT in the general population. It is unknown whether sevelamer, a phosphate (Pi) binder that lowers cholesterol and reduces inflammation in dialysis patients also affects EAT progression.

METHODS

Post-hoc analysis of a randomized trial of sevelamer (SVL) versus calcium-based Pi binders (CPiB) in incident hemodialysis patients. EAT was measured on cardiac computed tomography scans performed at enrollment, 6, 12 and 18 months from baseline.

RESULTS

Of 109 patients, 54 received SVL and 55 CPiB; the median LDL change was -16.4 % (IQR: -67.5, 142.3 %) and 12.1 % (IQR: -51.9, 193.8 %) with SVL and CPiB respectively (p < 0.001). At baseline EAT correlated significantly with gender, body mass index and total coronary artery calcium score (all p < 0.02). At the end of follow-up, EAT progressed significantly from baseline in the CPiB treated patients but not in the SVL treated patients [median increase 9.1 % (p = 0.005) vs 3.9 % (p = 0.25)]. However, there was no significant difference in the degree of progression between treatment groups (p = 0.34). There was no correlation between LDL or CRP change and EAT change. There were insufficient events in either arm to assess the impact of EAT change on mortality.

CONCLUSION

EAT progression from baseline was significantly smaller with SVL than with CPiB, although the difference between treatments was not statistically significant, probably due to the small sample size. Change in serum lipids and markers of inflammation did not predict EAT progression.

摘要

背景

在普通人群和血液透析患者中,心外膜脂肪组织(EAT)与死亡率增加和心血管事件相关。体重减轻和降脂治疗可减少普通人群的EAT。尚不清楚司维拉姆(一种降低透析患者胆固醇并减轻炎症的磷结合剂)是否也会影响EAT进展。

方法

对新入组血液透析患者中司维拉姆(SVL)与钙基磷结合剂(CPiB)进行随机试验的事后分析。在入组时、基线后6、12和18个月进行的心脏计算机断层扫描上测量EAT。

结果

109例患者中,54例接受SVL,55例接受CPiB;SVL组和CPiB组的低密度脂蛋白(LDL)中位数变化分别为-16.4%(四分位间距:-67.5,142.3%)和12.1%(四分位间距:-51.9,193.8%)(p<0.001)。基线时,EAT与性别、体重指数和总冠状动脉钙化评分显著相关(均p<0.02)。随访结束时,CPiB治疗的患者EAT较基线显著进展,而SVL治疗的患者则无进展[中位数增加9.1%(p=0.005)对3.9%(p=0.25)]。然而,治疗组之间的进展程度无显著差异(p=0.34)。LDL或C反应蛋白(CRP)变化与EAT变化之间无相关性。两组事件数均不足,无法评估EAT变化对死亡率的影响。

结论

与CPiB相比,SVL治疗使EAT较基线的进展显著更小,尽管治疗组间差异无统计学意义,可能是由于样本量小。血清脂质和炎症标志物的变化不能预测EAT进展。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验