Ingber Adam P, Hassenstab Jason, Fagan Anne M, Benzinger Tammie L S, Grant Elizabeth A, Holtzman David M, Morris John C, Roe Catherine M
Department of Biological Statistics and Computational Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;52(3):1055-64. doi: 10.3233/JAD-150478.
The influence of reserve variables and Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers on cognitive test performance has been fairly well-characterized. However, less is known about the influence of these factors on "non-cognitive" outcomes, including functional abilities and mood.
We examined whether cognitive and brain reserve variables mediate how AD biomarker levels in cognitively normal persons predict future changes in function, mood, and neuropsychiatric behavior.
Non-cognitive outcomes were examined in 328 individuals 50 years and older enrolled in ongoing studies of aging and dementia at the Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center (ADRC). All participants were cognitively normal at baseline (Clinical Dementia Rating [CDR] 0), completed cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and structural neuroimaging studies within one year of baseline, and were followed for an average of 4.6 annual visits. Linear mixed effects models explored how cognitive reserve and brain reserve variables mediate the relationships between AD biomarker levels and changes in function, mood, and neuropsychiatric behavior in cognitively normal participants.
Education levels did not have a significant effect on predicting non-cognitive decline. However, participants with smaller brain volumes exhibited the worst outcomes on measures of mood, functional abilities, and behavioral disturbance. This effect was most pronounced in individuals who also had abnormal CSF biomarkers.
The findings suggest that brain reserve plays a stronger, or earlier, role than cognitive reserve in protecting against non-cognitive impairment in AD.
储备变量和阿尔茨海默病(AD)生物标志物对认知测试表现的影响已得到较为充分的描述。然而,对于这些因素对“非认知”结果(包括功能能力和情绪)的影响,人们了解较少。
我们研究了认知和脑储备变量是否介导认知正常人群中AD生物标志物水平如何预测功能、情绪和神经精神行为的未来变化。
在奈特阿尔茨海默病研究中心(ADRC)正在进行的衰老与痴呆研究中,对328名50岁及以上的个体进行了非认知结果的检查。所有参与者在基线时认知正常(临床痴呆评定量表[CDR]为0),在基线后一年内完成了脑脊液(CSF)和结构性神经影像学研究,并平均随访了4.6次年度访视。线性混合效应模型探讨了认知储备和脑储备变量如何介导认知正常参与者中AD生物标志物水平与功能、情绪和神经精神行为变化之间的关系。
教育水平对预测非认知衰退没有显著影响。然而,脑容量较小的参与者在情绪、功能能力和行为障碍测量中表现出最差的结果。这种效应在脑脊液生物标志物也异常的个体中最为明显。
研究结果表明,在预防AD的非认知损害方面,脑储备比认知储备发挥着更强或更早的作用。