• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Measurements of high-frequency acoustic scattering from glacially eroded rock outcrops.

作者信息

Olson Derek R, Lyons Anthony P, Sæbø Torstein O

机构信息

Applied Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania 16804, USA.

University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire 03824, USA.

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Apr;139(4):1833. doi: 10.1121/1.4945589.

DOI:10.1121/1.4945589
PMID:27106331
Abstract

Measurements of acoustic backscattering from glacially eroded rock outcrops were made off the coast of Sandefjord, Norway using a high-frequency synthetic aperture sonar (SAS) system. A method by which scattering strength can be estimated from data collected by a SAS system is detailed, as well as a method to estimate an effective calibration parameter for the system. Scattering strength measurements from very smooth areas of the rock outcrops agree with predictions from both the small-slope approximation and perturbation theory, and range between -33 and -26 dB at 20° grazing angle. Scattering strength measurements from very rough areas of the rock outcrops agree with the sine-squared shape of the empirical Lambertian model and fall between -30 and -20 dB at 20° grazing angle. Both perturbation theory and the small-slope approximation are expected to be inaccurate for the very rough area, and overestimate scattering strength by 8 dB or more for all measurements of very rough surfaces. Supporting characterization of the environment was performed in the form of geoacoustic and roughness parameter estimates.

摘要

相似文献

1
Measurements of high-frequency acoustic scattering from glacially eroded rock outcrops.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Apr;139(4):1833. doi: 10.1121/1.4945589.
2
Small-slope simulation of acoustic backscatter from a physical model of an elastic ocean bottom.来自弹性海底物理模型的声学反向散射的小斜率模拟。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Nov;122(5):2551-9. doi: 10.1121/1.2783116.
3
Scattering statistics of rock outcrops: Model-data comparisons and Bayesian inference using mixture distributions.岩石露头的散射统计:基于混合分布的模型-数据比较与贝叶斯推断
J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 Feb;145(2):761. doi: 10.1121/1.5089892.
4
Characterization of seafloor roughness from high-frequency acoustic backscattering measurements in shallow water off the west coast of India.基于印度西海岸浅水区高频声学反向散射测量的海底粗糙度特征分析
J Acoust Soc Am. 2020 Nov;148(5):2987. doi: 10.1121/10.0002354.
5
The contribution of bubbles to high-frequency sea surface backscatter: a 24-h time series of field measurements.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Feb;113(2):769-80. doi: 10.1121/1.1532029.
6
Measurements of ocean bottom low-angle backscattering by single-mode reverberation.利用单模混响测量海底低角度反向散射
J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Dec;136(6):2976. doi: 10.1121/1.4898418.
7
Scattering from layered seafloors: Comparisons between theory and integral equations.分层海底的散射:理论与积分方程的比较
J Acoust Soc Am. 2020 Oct;148(4):2086. doi: 10.1121/10.0002164.
8
Resolution dependence of rough surface scattering using a power law roughness spectrum.基于幂律粗糙度谱的粗糙表面散射的分辨率依赖性
J Acoust Soc Am. 2021 Jan;149(1):28. doi: 10.1121/10.0002974.
9
A comparison of finite element and analytic models of acoustic scattering from rough poroelastic interfaces.粗糙多孔弹性界面声散射的有限元模型与解析模型比较
J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Apr;137(4):EL235-40. doi: 10.1121/1.4914947.
10
The effect of wind-generated bubbles on sea-surface backscattering at 940 Hz.风生气泡对 940 Hz 海面反向散射的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Nov;130(5):3413-20. doi: 10.1121/1.3626125.

引用本文的文献

1
Physics-Based Modelling and Simulation of Multibeam Echosounder Perception for Autonomous Underwater Manipulation.基于物理的多波束回声测深仪用于自主水下操作的感知建模与仿真
Front Robot AI. 2021 Sep 8;8:706646. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2021.706646. eCollection 2021.