Ayyagari Raj R, Yeh Cliff, Arici Melih, Mojibian Hamid, Reiner Eric, Pollak Jeffrey S
Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, 789 Howard Ave., New Haven, CT 06520-8042.
Department of Radiology, Permanente Medical Group, Vacaville, California.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016 May;27(5):689-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.01.005.
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous transvesicular drainage of pathologic pelvic fluid collections, a series of 15 patients who underwent 16 transvesicular drainage catheter placements was retrospectively reviewed. All patients had collections suspicious for infection that were posterior to the bladder or superior to the bladder behind loops of bowel, and were otherwise inaccessible. All 15 collections were percutaneously accessed via the bladder with standard drainage catheters. All collections resolved completely with no complications. Percutaneous transvesicular drainage was a safe and effective technique in this series, and can be considered when no direct percutaneous access routes are available.
为评估经皮经膀胱引流病理性盆腔积液的安全性和有效性,我们回顾性分析了15例患者接受16次经膀胱引流导管置入术的情况。所有患者的积液位于膀胱后方或肠袢后方膀胱上方,怀疑有感染,且无法通过其他方式引流。所有15例积液均通过标准引流导管经皮经膀胱穿刺引流。所有积液均完全消退,无并发症发生。在本系列研究中,经皮经膀胱引流是一种安全有效的技术,当没有直接的经皮穿刺引流途径时可以考虑采用。