Lu Zheng, Fassihi Reza
School of Pharmacy, Temple University, 3307 N. Broad Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19140, USA.
AAPS PharmSciTech. 2017 Feb;18(2):462-472. doi: 10.1208/s12249-016-0535-x. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
This article provides an analysis of dissolution kinetics associated with formulations subjected to different dissolution methods with the purpose of revealing credible direction on selection of apparatus type and hydrodynamics on in vitro drug release profiles using three different formulations. The dissolution kinetics of immediate release (IR) and controlled release (CR) ibuprofen tablets under different hydrodynamic conditions were determined, and potential existence of any correlation between USP apparatus I and II were analyzed using adequate kinetic models. Two types of CR tablets based on PEO (polyethylene oxide-N80) and HPMC (hydroxypropyl methylcellulose- K100M) polymers were prepared. Marketed ibuprofen 200-mg IR tablets were also used. Dissolution studies were carried out using USP 34 apparatuses I and II methods at stirring speed of 100 and 50 rpm in 900 mL phosphate buffer, pH 7.2 at 37°C. The drug release profiles for each formulation was determined and statistically analyzed using model-dependent, model-independent (f ), and ANOVA methods. No significant dissolution differences existed between IR tablets, whereas CR tablets were significantly impacted by apparatus types and hydrodynamics. PEO matrices displayed higher sensitivity to hydrodynamics relative to HPMC matrices, and differences in dissolution profiles were confirmed by ANOVA and boxplot analysis. It is concluded that in the case of CR systems, selection of apparatus type and adherence to the monograph specifications and hydrodynamic conditions is critical, while for IR tablets, both apparatus types and agitation rates had no significant impact on drug release rate, suggesting the possibility of apparatus interchangeability if desired.
本文对采用不同溶出方法的制剂的溶出动力学进行了分析,目的是利用三种不同制剂揭示体外药物释放曲线中装置类型和流体动力学选择的可靠方向。测定了速释(IR)和控释(CR)布洛芬片在不同流体动力学条件下的溶出动力学,并使用适当的动力学模型分析了美国药典装置I和II之间是否存在相关性。制备了两种基于PEO(聚环氧乙烷-N80)和HPMC(羟丙基甲基纤维素-K100M)聚合物的CR片。还使用了市售的200 mg布洛芬IR片。在37°C下,于900 mL pH 7.2的磷酸盐缓冲液中,以100和50 rpm的搅拌速度,采用美国药典34装置I和II方法进行溶出研究。测定每种制剂的药物释放曲线,并使用模型依赖、模型独立(f )和方差分析方法进行统计分析。IR片之间不存在显著的溶出差异,而CR片则受到装置类型和流体动力学的显著影响。相对于HPMC基质,PEO基质对流体动力学表现出更高的敏感性,溶出曲线的差异通过方差分析和箱线图分析得到证实。得出的结论是,对于CR系统,装置类型的选择以及符合专著规范和流体动力学条件至关重要,而对于IR片,装置类型和搅拌速率对药物释放速率均无显著影响,这表明如果需要,装置可以互换。