Mollart Lyndall, Skinner Virginia, Foureur Maralyn
Centre for Midwifery, Child and Family Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, New South Wales 2007, Australia.
School of Health, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, Northern Territory 0810, Australia.
Midwifery. 2016 May;36:21-7. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.02.020. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
this Australian feasibility study aimed to determine; the willingness of women experiencing a post-date pregnancy to participate in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of acupressure and compliance with the study protocol. The study also aimed to determine the effect size of the primary outcome in order to calculate a sample size for a future appropriately powered RCT.
a two-arm randomised controlled trial. Staff providing clinical care were blinded to group allocation unless the participant disclosed study participation.
maternity services at two outer metropolitan public hospitals in New South Wales, Australia
sixty seven healthy primigravid women experiencing a singleton cephalic pregnancy at 40 weeks±2 days gestation were assessed as eligible to participate and were provided with study information.
both groups received standard clinical care, with the intervention group also receiving verbal and written instructions on the self-administration of three acupoints (Spleen 6, Large Intestine 4, and Gall Bladder 21) to be used until spontaneous or induced labour began.
assessment of feasibility included determining recruitment rate and acceptability of an RCT for a CAM modality, and acupressure treatment compliance, via participant surveys. The primary clinical outcome was spontaneous onset of labour.
from the 67 women eligible during the timeframe for the study, 44 women (65.6%) agreed to participate and were randomised. There was no statistically significant difference in rate of spontaneous onset of labour (50% acupressure vs 41% control). Twenty nine participant surveys were returned (65.9%). In the intervention group there was a high compliance with the acupressure protocol (83%) and the use of the three acupoints (94%).
this feasibility study revealed that pregnant women are interested in the use of CAM, and acupressure in particular, for the initiation of labour. Most women found it acceptable to be randomised to receive the intervention. While the 9% difference in the primary outcome was not statistically significant it is the best estimate of the treatment effect for calculating a sample size of 994 for a future RCT with 80% power, alpha 0.05.
Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Register (ANZCTR): ANZCTR:12613000145707.
这项澳大利亚可行性研究旨在确定;过期妊娠女性参与穴位按压随机对照试验(RCT)的意愿以及对研究方案的依从性。该研究还旨在确定主要结局的效应大小,以便为未来有足够效力的RCT计算样本量。
双臂随机对照试验。提供临床护理的工作人员对分组情况不知情,除非参与者透露其参与了该研究。
澳大利亚新南威尔士州两家大都市外围公立医院的产科服务部门
67名健康初产妇,单胎头位妊娠,孕周为40周±2天,经评估有资格参与并收到了研究信息。
两组均接受标准临床护理,干预组还收到关于自行按压三个穴位(三阴交、合谷、胆囊21)的口头和书面指导,直至自然分娩或引产开始。
可行性评估包括通过参与者调查确定RCT对一种补充替代医学模式的招募率和可接受性,以及穴位按压治疗的依从性。主要临床结局是自然分娩的开始。
在该研究时间范围内符合条件的67名女性中,44名女性(65.6%)同意参与并被随机分组。自然分娩率在穴位按压组和对照组之间无统计学显著差异(穴位按压组为50%,对照组为41%)。共收回29份参与者调查问卷(65.9%)。在干预组中,穴位按压方案的依从性较高(83%),三个穴位的使用依从性也较高(94%)。
这项可行性研究表明,孕妇对使用补充替代医学,尤其是穴位按压来启动分娩感兴趣。大多数女性认为被随机分组接受干预是可以接受的。虽然主要结局9%的差异无统计学显著性,但这是为未来效力为80%、α为0.05的RCT计算样本量994时对治疗效果的最佳估计。
澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心(ANZCTR):ANZCTR:12613000145707