White B L
Psychol Rep. 1989 Apr;64(2):397-8. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1989.64.2.397.
Razel's examination of the early work of McGraw and the Dennises puts a heavy requirement on studies of single subjects and on some possible interpretations for which, unfortunately, documentation is insufficient. Further, the Dennises placed more emphasis on the autotelic quality of motor mastery than Razel notes. Rather than looking for these persons whose behavior was studied long ago, direct study of motor mastery by systematic provision of enrichment conditions during early development is more likely to be instructive and a better use of scientific resources.
拉泽尔对麦格劳和丹尼斯早期作品的审视，对单一主题研究以及某些可能的解释提出了很高要求，遗憾的是，相关文献并不充分。此外，丹尼斯夫妇对运动技能掌握的自我满足特质的强调比拉泽尔所指出的更多。与其去寻找那些行为早在很久以前就被研究过的人，不如在早期发展过程中通过系统地提供丰富条件来直接研究运动技能掌握，这样更有可能具有启发性，也是对科学资源的更好利用。
