• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过数据系统之间的比较来监测数据质量。

Monitoring data quality through comparisons between data systems.

作者信息

Massey J T, Hoffman K L

机构信息

National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control, Hyattesville, MD 20782.

出版信息

Stat Med. 1989 Mar;8(3):367-77. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780080318.

DOI:10.1002/sim.4780080318
PMID:2711067
Abstract

Since its creation in 1960, the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) has placed a high value on the quality of the information and statistics collected and published by its data systems. An important component of a comprehensive data quality monitoring system for a statistical agency such as NCHS is the comparison of statistics between data systems. Between-data-systems comparisons are used to monitor the consistency and comparability of statistics across data systems and between NCHS data systems and outside sources of data. This paper focuses on between-data-systems comparisons and describes a number of methodological analyses that can be used to evaluate data quality. The methodological analyses presented include the evaluation of time trends, the estimation of survey method effects, the evaluation of response error, the measurement of definitional and concept effects, and the detection of inconsistencies between data systems. The paper concludes with a discussion of the complexities of the between-data-systems comparisons and an assessment of the net benefits from such comparisons.

摘要

自1960年成立以来,美国国家卫生统计中心(NCHS)一直高度重视其数据系统所收集和发布的信息及统计数据的质量。对于像NCHS这样的统计机构而言,全面的数据质量监测系统的一个重要组成部分是数据系统之间统计数据的比较。数据系统间的比较用于监测各数据系统之间以及NCHS数据系统与外部数据源之间统计数据的一致性和可比性。本文重点关注数据系统间的比较,并描述了一些可用于评估数据质量的方法分析。所介绍的方法分析包括时间趋势评估、调查方法效应估计、应答误差评估、定义和概念效应测量以及数据系统间不一致性检测。本文最后讨论了数据系统间比较的复杂性,并评估了此类比较的净收益。

相似文献

1
Monitoring data quality through comparisons between data systems.通过数据系统之间的比较来监测数据质量。
Stat Med. 1989 Mar;8(3):367-77. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780080318.
2
Use and interpretation of diagnostic statistics from selected data systems.
Vital Health Stat 2. 1988 Jan(107):1-54.
3
Design and estimation for the national health interview survey, 2006-2015.2006 - 2015年国家健康访谈调查的设计与评估
Vital Health Stat 2. 2014 Apr(165):1-53.
4
National Center for Health Statistics Guidelines for Analysis of Trends.国家卫生统计中心趋势分析指南
Vital Health Stat 2. 2018 Apr(179):1-71.
5
Calibration Weighting Methods for the National Center for Health Statistics Research and Development Survey.美国国家卫生统计中心研究与发展调查的校准加权方法
Vital Health Stat 2. 2023 Mar(199):1-23.
6
The role of NCHS data systems in the evaluation of intervention and prevention strategies.
Stat Med. 1993 Feb;12(3-4):207-15. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780120305.
7
Linkage of NCHS Population Health Surveys to Administrative Records From Social Security Administration and Centers for Medicare Medicaid Services.国家卫生统计中心(NCHS)人口健康调查与社会保障管理局和医疗保险与医疗补助服务中心行政记录的关联。
Vital Health Stat 1. 2015 Sep(58):1-53.
8
National Center for Health Statistics Data Presentation Standards for Proportions.国家卫生统计中心比例数据呈现标准
Vital Health Stat 2. 2017 Aug(175):1-22.
9
Comparability of the birth certificate and 1988 Maternal and Infant Health Survey.出生证明与1988年母婴健康调查的可比性。
Vital Health Stat 2. 1993 Mar(116):1-19.
10
Changing methods of NCHS surveys: 1960-2010 and beyond.国家卫生统计中心调查方法的变迁:1960 - 2010年及以后
MMWR Suppl. 2011 Oct 7;60(4):42-8.