Suppr超能文献

乳腺癌患者第四次及后续治疗后18F-FDG PET/CT扫描的价值

Value of fourth and subsequent post-therapy follow-up 18F-FDG PET/CT scans in patients with breast cancer.

作者信息

Taghipour Mehdi, Sheikhbahaei Sara, Trahan Tyler J, Subramaniam Rathan M

机构信息

aRussell H Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological SciencesbDepartment of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of MedicinecDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Nucl Med Commun. 2016 Jun;37(6):602-8. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000491.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accuracy and value of the fourth and subsequent post-therapy follow-up fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (F-FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT) scans in the clinical assessment of breast cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety-two female patients, with a total of 426 fourth and subsequent follow-up PET/CT scans, were retrospectively included. Patients were followed for a median of 23.7 months (range, 0.7-124.4) from the fourth follow-up PET/CT. The diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT, its impact on clinical assessment, patients' management, and survival outcome were established.

RESULT

Of the 426 follow-up PET/CT scans, 264 (62%) were interpreted as positive and 162 (38%) were interpreted as negative. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the fourth and subsequent follow-up PET/CT scans were 97.7, 98.1, 98.8, 96.3, and 97.9%, respectively. Fourth and subsequent follow-up PET/CT were useful in excluding a tumor in 13.4% (39/292) of patients with a clinical suspicion of recurrence and identifying suspected recurrence in 10.5% (14/134) of patients without previous clinical suspicion. A change in management was noted in 6.7% (9/134) of scan times when the scans were performed without previous clinical suspicion of recurrence or therapy response and was 27.7% (81/292) when the scans were performed with clinical suspicion. Overall survival differed significantly between patients with all negative follow-up scans (n=23) and those who had at least one positive follow-up scan (n=69) (hazard ratio of 4.65, P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The fourth and subsequent PET/CT scans performed after the completion of primary treatment led to a change in management in 27.7% of patients when the scans were performed with clinical suspicion and only in 6.7% of patients when performed without clinical suspicion or context.

摘要

目的

评估乳腺癌患者初次治疗后第四次及后续随访的氟-18氟脱氧葡萄糖(F-FDG)正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)在临床评估中的准确性和价值。

材料与方法

回顾性纳入92例女性患者,共进行了426次第四次及后续随访PET/CT扫描。从第四次随访PET/CT开始,患者的中位随访时间为23.7个月(范围0.7 - 124.4个月)。确定了PET/CT的诊断准确性、其对临床评估、患者管理和生存结果的影响。

结果

在426次随访PET/CT扫描中,264次(62%)被解读为阳性,162次(38%)被解读为阴性。第四次及后续随访PET/CT扫描的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确性分别为97.7%、98.1%、98.8%、96.3%和97.9%。第四次及后续随访PET/CT对13.4%(39/292)临床怀疑复发的患者排除肿瘤以及对10.5%(14/134)既往无临床怀疑的患者识别疑似复发有用。在无既往临床复发怀疑或治疗反应怀疑时进行扫描,6.7%(9/134)的扫描时间出现管理变化;在有临床怀疑时进行扫描,这一比例为27.7%(81/292)。所有随访扫描均为阴性的患者(n = 23)与至少有一次随访扫描为阳性的患者(n = 69)的总生存期有显著差异(风险比为4.65,P < 0.001)。

结论

初次治疗完成后进行的第四次及后续PET/CT扫描,在有临床怀疑时进行扫描,27.7%的患者管理发生变化;在无临床怀疑或背景时进行扫描,仅6.7%的患者管理发生变化。

相似文献

1
Value of fourth and subsequent post-therapy follow-up 18F-FDG PET/CT scans in patients with breast cancer.
Nucl Med Commun. 2016 Jun;37(6):602-8. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000491.
3
The value of follow-up FDG-PET/CT in the management and prognosis of patients with HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2015 Dec;59(6):681-6. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12354. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
5
¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and Colorectal Cancer: Value of Fourth and Subsequent Posttherapy Follow-up Scans for Patient Management.
J Nucl Med. 2015 Jul;56(7):989-94. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.156240. Epub 2015 May 7.
8
18F-FDG PET/CT and lung cancer: value of fourth and subsequent posttherapy follow-up scans for patient management.
J Nucl Med. 2015 Feb;56(2):204-8. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.114.147884. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
10
Initial [18F]FDG PET/CT in high-risk DTC patients. A three-year follow-up.
Nuklearmedizin. 2016 Jun 28;55(3):99-103. doi: 10.3413/Nukmed-0766-15-09. Epub 2016 Feb 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic Value of FDG PET/CT in Surveillance after Curative Resection of Breast Cancer.
Cancers (Basel). 2023 May 7;15(9):2646. doi: 10.3390/cancers15092646.
2
Follow-Up Strategies and Detection of Recurrent Breast Cancer in the Modern Era.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2023 Apr 1;24(4):1359-1366. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.4.1359.

本文引用的文献

1
FDG Avidity and Tumor Burden: Survival Outcomes for Patients With Recurrent Breast Cancer.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Apr;206(4):846-55. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.15106. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
2
The value of follow-up FDG-PET/CT in the management and prognosis of patients with HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2015 Dec;59(6):681-6. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12354. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
3
¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and Colorectal Cancer: Value of Fourth and Subsequent Posttherapy Follow-up Scans for Patient Management.
J Nucl Med. 2015 Jul;56(7):989-94. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.156240. Epub 2015 May 7.
5
18F-FDG PET/CT and lung cancer: value of fourth and subsequent posttherapy follow-up scans for patient management.
J Nucl Med. 2015 Feb;56(2):204-8. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.114.147884. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
9
Follow-up or Surveillance (18)F-FDG PET/CT and Survival Outcome in Lung Cancer Patients.
J Nucl Med. 2014 Jul;55(7):1062-8. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.113.136770. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
10
Breast cancer version 3.2014.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2014 Apr;12(4):542-90. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2014.0058.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验