Taghipour Mehdi, Sheikhbahaei Sara, Trahan Tyler J, Subramaniam Rathan M
aRussell H Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological SciencesbDepartment of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of MedicinecDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Nucl Med Commun. 2016 Jun;37(6):602-8. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000491.
To evaluate the accuracy and value of the fourth and subsequent post-therapy follow-up fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (F-FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT) scans in the clinical assessment of breast cancer patients.
Ninety-two female patients, with a total of 426 fourth and subsequent follow-up PET/CT scans, were retrospectively included. Patients were followed for a median of 23.7 months (range, 0.7-124.4) from the fourth follow-up PET/CT. The diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT, its impact on clinical assessment, patients' management, and survival outcome were established.
Of the 426 follow-up PET/CT scans, 264 (62%) were interpreted as positive and 162 (38%) were interpreted as negative. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the fourth and subsequent follow-up PET/CT scans were 97.7, 98.1, 98.8, 96.3, and 97.9%, respectively. Fourth and subsequent follow-up PET/CT were useful in excluding a tumor in 13.4% (39/292) of patients with a clinical suspicion of recurrence and identifying suspected recurrence in 10.5% (14/134) of patients without previous clinical suspicion. A change in management was noted in 6.7% (9/134) of scan times when the scans were performed without previous clinical suspicion of recurrence or therapy response and was 27.7% (81/292) when the scans were performed with clinical suspicion. Overall survival differed significantly between patients with all negative follow-up scans (n=23) and those who had at least one positive follow-up scan (n=69) (hazard ratio of 4.65, P<0.001).
The fourth and subsequent PET/CT scans performed after the completion of primary treatment led to a change in management in 27.7% of patients when the scans were performed with clinical suspicion and only in 6.7% of patients when performed without clinical suspicion or context.
评估乳腺癌患者初次治疗后第四次及后续随访的氟-18氟脱氧葡萄糖(F-FDG)正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)在临床评估中的准确性和价值。
回顾性纳入92例女性患者,共进行了426次第四次及后续随访PET/CT扫描。从第四次随访PET/CT开始,患者的中位随访时间为23.7个月(范围0.7 - 124.4个月)。确定了PET/CT的诊断准确性、其对临床评估、患者管理和生存结果的影响。
在426次随访PET/CT扫描中,264次(62%)被解读为阳性,162次(38%)被解读为阴性。第四次及后续随访PET/CT扫描的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确性分别为97.7%、98.1%、98.8%、96.3%和97.9%。第四次及后续随访PET/CT对13.4%(39/292)临床怀疑复发的患者排除肿瘤以及对10.5%(14/134)既往无临床怀疑的患者识别疑似复发有用。在无既往临床复发怀疑或治疗反应怀疑时进行扫描,6.7%(9/134)的扫描时间出现管理变化;在有临床怀疑时进行扫描,这一比例为27.7%(81/292)。所有随访扫描均为阴性的患者(n = 23)与至少有一次随访扫描为阳性的患者(n = 69)的总生存期有显著差异(风险比为4.65,P < 0.001)。
初次治疗完成后进行的第四次及后续PET/CT扫描,在有临床怀疑时进行扫描,27.7%的患者管理发生变化;在无临床怀疑或背景时进行扫描,仅6.7%的患者管理发生变化。