• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

专科物理治疗师的治疗是否会改变有股骨髋臼撞击症症状的年轻人的疼痛和功能?一项随机对照试验的试点项目。

Does treatment by a specialist physiotherapist change pain and function in young adults with symptoms from femoroacetabular impingement? A pilot project for a randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Smeatham Alison, Powell Roy, Moore Sarah, Chauhan Rohan, Wilson Matthew

机构信息

Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust (RDEFT), Barrack Road, Exeter EX2 5DW, Devon, United Kingdom; Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Centre, Barrack Road, Exeter EX2 5DW, Devon, United Kingdom.

Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust (RDEFT), Barrack Road, Exeter EX2 5DW, Devon, United Kingdom; University of Exeter Medical School, St. Lukes Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter EX1 2LU, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Physiotherapy. 2017 Jun;103(2):201-207. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2016.02.004. Epub 2016 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.physio.2016.02.004
PMID:27112096
Abstract

AIM

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is recognised as a source of hip pain but the effect of conservative treatment remains untested. This pilot study aimed to inform and evaluate the methods required to conduct a substantive trial comparing the effect of treatment by a physiotherapist versus routine care on the symptoms of FAI.

DESIGN

A parallel group, pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT).

SETTING

A single NHS acute hospital trust, Devon, England.

PARTICIPANTS

30 adults with symptomatic FAI were recruited. 23 (77%) completed the study.

INTERVENTIONS

Intervention was 3 months of treatment by a specialist physiotherapist. The control group received routine care.

MAIN OUTCOMES

Change in pain and function was measured using a Visual Analogue Scale, Non Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), Lower Extremity Functional Score (LEFS) and Hip Outcome Score.

RESULTS

Participants in the intervention arm undertook a personalised exercise programme to improve pelvic and femoral control plus advice on posture, activity pacing and pain relief. The mean change in NAHS for the intervention group was 12.7 (95% CI 4.7 to 20.7) and 1.8 (95% CI -5.3 to 9.0) in the control group; Median change in LEFS was 11.5 (95% CI 5.0 to 26.0) versus -1.0 (95% CI -7.0 to 4.0). This improvement in LEFS was beyond minimal clinically important difference in the intervention group. Pain scores improved marginally in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Methodological strengths and weaknesses were successfully identified for a substantive study. Further research is needed to evaluate the relative influence of structural and neuromuscular features on symptoms of FAI and the role of conservative treatment.

摘要

目的

股骨髋臼撞击症(FAI)被认为是髋关节疼痛的一个原因,但保守治疗的效果尚未得到验证。这项初步研究旨在为一项比较物理治疗师治疗与常规护理对FAI症状影响的实质性试验提供信息并评估所需方法。

设计

平行组、初步随机对照试验(RCT)。

设置

英国德文郡一家国民保健服务(NHS)急性医院信托机构。

参与者

招募了30名有症状的FAI成年患者。23名(77%)完成了研究。

干预措施

干预为接受专科物理治疗师3个月的治疗。对照组接受常规护理。

主要结局

使用视觉模拟量表、非关节炎髋关节评分(NAHS)、下肢功能评分(LEFS)和髋关节结局评分来测量疼痛和功能的变化。

结果

干预组的参与者进行了个性化运动计划,以改善骨盆和股骨控制,并获得了关于姿势、活动节奏和疼痛缓解的建议。干预组NAHS的平均变化为12.7(95%置信区间4.7至20.7),对照组为1.8(95%置信区间-5.3至9.0);LEFS的中位数变化为11.5(95%置信区间5.0至26.0),而对照组为-1.0(95%置信区间-7.0至4.0)。干预组LEFS的这种改善超出了最小临床重要差异。两组的疼痛评分均略有改善。

结论

成功确定了一项实质性研究的方法学优缺点。需要进一步研究以评估结构和神经肌肉特征对FAI症状的相对影响以及保守治疗的作用。

相似文献

1
Does treatment by a specialist physiotherapist change pain and function in young adults with symptoms from femoroacetabular impingement? A pilot project for a randomised controlled trial.专科物理治疗师的治疗是否会改变有股骨髋臼撞击症症状的年轻人的疼痛和功能?一项随机对照试验的试点项目。
Physiotherapy. 2017 Jun;103(2):201-207. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2016.02.004. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
2
Multi-centre randomised controlled trial comparing arthroscopic hip surgery to physiotherapist-led care for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome on hip cartilage metabolism: the Australian FASHIoN trial.多中心随机对照试验比较髋关节镜手术与物理治疗师主导的治疗方案对髋关节撞击综合征(FAI)患者髋关节软骨代谢的影响:澳大利亚 FASHIoN 试验。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Aug 16;22(1):697. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04576-z.
3
UK FASHIoN: feasibility study of a randomised controlled trial of arthroscopic surgery for hip impingement compared with best conservative care.英国时尚:髋关节撞击症关节镜手术与最佳保守治疗随机对照试验的可行性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Apr;20(32):1-172. doi: 10.3310/hta20320.
4
Protocol for a multicentre, parallel-arm, 12-month, randomised, controlled trial of arthroscopic surgery versus conservative care for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FASHIoN).一项关于关节镜手术与保守治疗股骨髋臼撞击综合征(FASHIoN)的多中心、平行组、12个月随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 31;6(8):e012453. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012453.
5
Non-operative management of femoroacetabular impingement: A prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial pilot study.股骨髋臼撞击症的非手术治疗:一项前瞻性随机对照临床试验的初步研究。
J Sci Med Sport. 2016 Sep;19(9):716-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2015.11.008. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
6
Efficacy of a physiotherapy rehabilitation program for individuals undergoing arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement - the FAIR trial: a randomised controlled trial protocol.一项针对接受股骨髋臼撞击症关节镜治疗患者的物理治疗康复计划的疗效——FAIR试验:一项随机对照试验方案
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Feb 26;15:58. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-58.
7
Efficacy of adding a physiotherapy rehabilitation programme to arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: a randomised controlled trial (FAIR).在股骨髋臼撞击综合征关节镜治疗中增加物理治疗康复计划的疗效:一项随机对照试验(FAIR)
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 23;7(6):e014658. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014658.
8
Personalised Hip Therapy: development of a non-operative protocol to treat femoroacetabular impingement syndrome in the FASHIoN randomised controlled trial.个性化髋关节治疗:在FASHIoN随机对照试验中制定一种非手术方案来治疗股骨髋臼撞击综合征。
Br J Sports Med. 2016 Oct;50(19):1217-23. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096368.
9
A multi-centre randomized controlled trial comparing arthroscopic osteochondroplasty and lavage with arthroscopic lavage alone on patient important outcomes and quality of life in the treatment of young adult (18-50) femoroacetabular impingement.一项多中心随机对照试验,比较关节镜下骨软骨成形术联合灌洗与单纯关节镜下灌洗对年轻成人(18至50岁)股骨髋臼撞击症患者重要结局和生活质量的影响。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Mar 20;16:64. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0500-y.
10
Physiotherapist-led treatment for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (the PhysioFIRST study): a protocol for a participant and assessor-blinded randomised controlled trial.物理治疗师主导的治疗股骨髋臼撞击综合征(PhysioFIRST 研究):一项参与者和评估者盲法随机对照试验的方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 7;11(4):e041742. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041742.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimal Clinically Important Differences in Conservative Treatment Versus Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Frequentist Meta-Analysis of RCTs.保守治疗与髋关节镜治疗股骨髋臼撞击综合征的最小临床重要差异:随机对照试验的频率学派Meta分析
Orthop Surg. 2025 Sep;17(9):2514-2528. doi: 10.1111/os.70097. Epub 2025 Jul 5.
2
Conservative treatment versus hip arthroscopy in patients with femoroacetabular impingement : a multilevel meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.股骨髋臼撞击症患者的保守治疗与髋关节镜检查:随机对照试验的多水平荟萃分析
Bone Jt Open. 2025 Apr 23;6(4):480-498. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.64.BJO-2024-0198.R1.
3
Femoroacetabular Impingement: Critical Analysis Review of Current Nonoperative Treatments.
股骨髋臼撞击症:当前非手术治疗的批判性分析综述
JBJS Rev. 2025 Apr 16;13(4). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.24.00211. eCollection 2025 Apr 1.
4
Non-operative Management and Outcomes of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.股骨髋臼撞击综合征的非手术治疗与预后
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2023 Nov;16(11):501-513. doi: 10.1007/s12178-023-09863-x. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
5
What is the Rate of Response to Nonoperative Treatment for Hip-Related Pain? A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis.髋关节相关性疼痛的非手术治疗的反应率是多少?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2023 May;53(5):286–306. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2023.11666.
6
Conservative vs. Surgical Management for Femoro-Acetabular Impingement: A Systematic Review of Clinical Evidence.股骨髋臼撞击症的保守治疗与手术治疗:临床证据的系统评价
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 2;11(19):5852. doi: 10.3390/jcm11195852.
7
Improving function in people with hip-related pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of physiotherapist-led interventions for hip-related pain.改善与髋关节疼痛相关的人群的功能:物理治疗师主导的髋关节相关疼痛干预措施的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Dec;54(23):1382-1394. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-101690. Epub 2020 May 6.
8
SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES OF CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT FOR FEMOROACETABULAR IMPINGEMENT: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.股骨髋臼撞击综合征保守治疗的短期疗效:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2019 Jul;14(4):514-524.
9
A randomized controlled trial protocol for an interdisciplinary evaluation of non-arthritic hip disease.一项关于非关节炎性髋关节疾病跨学科评估的随机对照试验方案。
Eur J Pers Cent Healthc. 2019;7(1):133-141.
10
NON-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF INDIVIDUALS WITH NON-ARTHRITIC HIP PAIN: A LITERATURE REVIEW.非关节炎性髋关节疼痛患者的非手术治疗:文献综述
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2019 Feb;14(1):135-147.