Smeatham Alison, Powell Roy, Moore Sarah, Chauhan Rohan, Wilson Matthew
Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust (RDEFT), Barrack Road, Exeter EX2 5DW, Devon, United Kingdom; Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Centre, Barrack Road, Exeter EX2 5DW, Devon, United Kingdom.
Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust (RDEFT), Barrack Road, Exeter EX2 5DW, Devon, United Kingdom; University of Exeter Medical School, St. Lukes Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter EX1 2LU, United Kingdom.
Physiotherapy. 2017 Jun;103(2):201-207. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2016.02.004. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is recognised as a source of hip pain but the effect of conservative treatment remains untested. This pilot study aimed to inform and evaluate the methods required to conduct a substantive trial comparing the effect of treatment by a physiotherapist versus routine care on the symptoms of FAI.
A parallel group, pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT).
A single NHS acute hospital trust, Devon, England.
30 adults with symptomatic FAI were recruited. 23 (77%) completed the study.
Intervention was 3 months of treatment by a specialist physiotherapist. The control group received routine care.
Change in pain and function was measured using a Visual Analogue Scale, Non Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), Lower Extremity Functional Score (LEFS) and Hip Outcome Score.
Participants in the intervention arm undertook a personalised exercise programme to improve pelvic and femoral control plus advice on posture, activity pacing and pain relief. The mean change in NAHS for the intervention group was 12.7 (95% CI 4.7 to 20.7) and 1.8 (95% CI -5.3 to 9.0) in the control group; Median change in LEFS was 11.5 (95% CI 5.0 to 26.0) versus -1.0 (95% CI -7.0 to 4.0). This improvement in LEFS was beyond minimal clinically important difference in the intervention group. Pain scores improved marginally in both groups.
Methodological strengths and weaknesses were successfully identified for a substantive study. Further research is needed to evaluate the relative influence of structural and neuromuscular features on symptoms of FAI and the role of conservative treatment.
股骨髋臼撞击症(FAI)被认为是髋关节疼痛的一个原因,但保守治疗的效果尚未得到验证。这项初步研究旨在为一项比较物理治疗师治疗与常规护理对FAI症状影响的实质性试验提供信息并评估所需方法。
平行组、初步随机对照试验(RCT)。
英国德文郡一家国民保健服务(NHS)急性医院信托机构。
招募了30名有症状的FAI成年患者。23名(77%)完成了研究。
干预为接受专科物理治疗师3个月的治疗。对照组接受常规护理。
使用视觉模拟量表、非关节炎髋关节评分(NAHS)、下肢功能评分(LEFS)和髋关节结局评分来测量疼痛和功能的变化。
干预组的参与者进行了个性化运动计划,以改善骨盆和股骨控制,并获得了关于姿势、活动节奏和疼痛缓解的建议。干预组NAHS的平均变化为12.7(95%置信区间4.7至20.7),对照组为1.8(95%置信区间-5.3至9.0);LEFS的中位数变化为11.5(95%置信区间5.0至26.0),而对照组为-1.0(95%置信区间-7.0至4.0)。干预组LEFS的这种改善超出了最小临床重要差异。两组的疼痛评分均略有改善。
成功确定了一项实质性研究的方法学优缺点。需要进一步研究以评估结构和神经肌肉特征对FAI症状的相对影响以及保守治疗的作用。