Salmen Tatjana, Ermakova Tatiana, Möller Andreas, Seipelt Matthias, Weikert Sebastian, Rummich Julius, Gross Manfred, Nawka Tadeus, Caffier Philipp P
Department of Audiology and Phoniatrics; Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, D-10117 Berlin, Germany.
Department of Information and Communication Management, Technical University Berlin, Straße des 17. Juni 135, D-10623 Berlin, Germany.
J Voice. 2017 Jan;31(1):114.e7-114.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.03.016. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
This study aimed to present vocal extent measure (VEM), demonstrate its changes with phonomicrosurgical treatment in patients with vocal fold polyps (VFPs), and to compare its performance to that of established vocal parameters.
This is an individual cohort study.
Microlaryngoscopic ablation was executed in 61 patients with manifestation of VFP (28 male, 33 female; 45 ± 13 years [mean ± SD]). Analysis of treatment outcome was based on pre- and postoperative voice function diagnostics and videolaryngostroboscopy. Examination instruments were: auditory-perceptual voice assessment (roughness, breathiness, and overall hoarseness [RBH]-status), voice range profile (VRP), acoustic-aerodynamic analysis, and patients' self-assessment of voice using the voice handicap index. The VEM, a parameter not yet commonly established in phoniatric diagnostics, was calculated from area and shape of the VRP to be compared with the dysphonia severity index (DSI) concerning diagnostic suitability.
All polyps were completely excised. Three months postoperatively, mucosal wave propagation had recovered. All subjective and most objective acoustic and aerodynamic parameters showed highly significant improvement. The VHI-9i-score decreased from 15 ± 8 to 6 ± 7 points. The average total vocal range extended by 4 ± 5 semitones, the mean speaking pitch decreased by 1 ± 2 semitones. The DSI increased on average from 2.6 ± 2.1 to 4.0 ± 2.2, VEM from 83 ± 28 to 107 ± 21 (P < 0.01). VEM and DSI correlated significantly with each other (r = 0.65; P < 0.01).
Phonomicrosurgery of VFP is an objectively and subjectively satisfactory therapy for voice improvement. The VEM represents a comprehensible and easy-to-use unidimensional measure for objective VRP evaluation. This positive measure of vocal function seems to be a compelling diagnostic addition for objective quantification of vocal performance.
本研究旨在提出嗓音范围测量(VEM),展示其在声带息肉(VFP)患者接受喉显微外科治疗后的变化,并将其性能与既定的嗓音参数进行比较。
这是一项个体队列研究。
对61例有VFP表现的患者(28例男性,33例女性;45±13岁[平均±标准差])实施显微喉镜下切除术。治疗结果分析基于术前和术后的嗓音功能诊断及视频喉镜频闪检查。检查仪器包括:听觉-感知嗓音评估(粗糙感、气息声和总体嘶哑程度[RBH]状态)、嗓音范围剖面图(VRP)、声学-空气动力学分析以及患者使用嗓音障碍指数对嗓音的自我评估。VEM是一个在嗓音诊断中尚未普遍确立的参数,根据VRP的面积和形状计算得出,以便与关于诊断适用性的发声障碍严重程度指数(DSI)进行比较。
所有息肉均被完全切除。术后三个月,黏膜波传播恢复。所有主观以及大多数客观的声学和空气动力学参数均显示出高度显著的改善。嗓音障碍指数-9i评分从15±8降至6±7分。平均总嗓音范围扩展了4±5个半音,平均说话音高降低了1±2个半音。DSI平均从2.6±2.1增至4.0±2.2,VEM从83±28增至107±21(P<0.01)。VEM与DSI之间存在显著相关性(r=0.65;P<0.01)。
VFP的喉显微外科手术在客观和主观上都是改善嗓音的令人满意的治疗方法。VEM是一种用于客观VRP评估的易于理解且便于使用的一维测量方法。这种对嗓音功能的积极测量似乎是客观量化嗓音表现的一个有说服力的诊断补充。