Suppr超能文献

带蒂和骨骼化的单支及双侧胸廓内动脉移植与胸骨伤口并发症的发生率:来自动脉血运重建试验的见解

Pedicled and skeletonized single and bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts and the incidence of sternal wound complications: Insights from the Arterial Revascularization Trial.

作者信息

Benedetto Umberto, Altman Douglas G, Gerry Stephen, Gray Alastair, Lees Belinda, Pawlaczyk Rafal, Flather Marcus, Taggart David P

机构信息

Bristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, School of Clinical Sciences, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology & Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Jul;152(1):270-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.03.056. Epub 2016 Apr 6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The question of whether skeletonized internal thoracic artery harvesting reduces the incidence of sternal wound complications in comparison with the pedicled technique, in the context of single or bilateral internal thoracic arteries, remains controversial. We studied the impact of the internal thoracic artery harvesting strategy on sternal wound complication in the Arterial Revascularization Trial.

METHODS

Patients enrolled in the Arterial Revascularization Trial (n = 3102) were randomized to coronary artery bypass grafting with single or bilateral internal thoracic arteries. Sternal wound complication rates were examined according to the harvesting technique that was documented in 2056 patients. The internal thoracic artery harvesting technique, based on the surgeon's preference, resulted in 4 groups: pedicled single internal thoracic artery (n = 607), pedicled bilateral internal thoracic artery (n = 459), skeletonized single internal thoracic artery (n = 512), and skeletonized bilateral internal thoracic artery (n = 478). Propensity scores weighting was used to estimate the impact of the harvesting technique on sternal wound complications.

RESULTS

A total of 219 of 2056 patients (10.6%) experienced a sternal wound complication within 1 year from the index operation. Of those, only 25 patients (1.2%) required sternal wound reconstruction. Pedicled bilateral internal thoracic artery (odds ratio [OR], 1.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23-2.63) but not skeletonized bilateral internal thoracic artery (OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.65-1.53) or skeletonized single internal thoracic artery (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.57-1.38) was associated with a significantly increased risk of any sternal wound complications compared with pedicled single internal thoracic artery.

CONCLUSIONS

The present Arterial Revascularization Trial substudy suggests that, with a skeletonization technique, the risk of sternal wound complication with bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting is similar to that after standard pedicled single internal thoracic artery harvesting, whereas skeletonized single internal thoracic artery harvesting did not add any further benefit when compared with pedicled single internal thoracic artery harvesting.

摘要

目的

在单支或双支胸廓内动脉的情况下,与带蒂技术相比,采用骨骼化胸廓内动脉获取技术是否能降低胸骨伤口并发症的发生率,这一问题仍存在争议。我们在动脉血运重建试验中研究了胸廓内动脉获取策略对胸骨伤口并发症的影响。

方法

纳入动脉血运重建试验的患者(n = 3102)被随机分配接受单支或双支胸廓内动脉冠状动脉旁路移植术。根据2056例患者记录的获取技术检查胸骨伤口并发症发生率。根据外科医生的偏好,胸廓内动脉获取技术分为4组:带蒂单支胸廓内动脉(n = 607)、带蒂双支胸廓内动脉(n = 459)、骨骼化单支胸廓内动脉(n = 512)和骨骼化双支胸廓内动脉(n = 478)。采用倾向评分加权法来评估获取技术对胸骨伤口并发症的影响。

结果

2056例患者中共有219例(10.6%)在初次手术后1年内发生胸骨伤口并发症。其中,仅25例患者(1.2%)需要进行胸骨伤口重建。与带蒂单支胸廓内动脉相比,带蒂双支胸廓内动脉(比值比[OR],1.80;95%置信区间[CI],1.23 - 2.63)与任何胸骨伤口并发症风险显著增加相关,但骨骼化双支胸廓内动脉(OR,1.00;95% CI,0.65 - 1.53)或骨骼化单支胸廓内动脉(OR,0.89;95% CI,0.57 - 1.38)并非如此。

结论

目前的动脉血运重建试验子研究表明,采用骨骼化技术时,双支胸廓内动脉移植的胸骨伤口并发症风险与标准带蒂单支胸廓内动脉获取后的风险相似,而与带蒂单支胸廓内动脉获取相比,骨骼化单支胸廓内动脉获取并未带来更多益处。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验