Dayangac Murat, Tokat Yaman
Liver Transplantation Unit, Istanbul Bilim University, Florence Nightingale Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2016 Apr;5(2):151-8. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2304-3881.2015.08.01.
In living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), an adequate hepatic venous outflow constitutes one of the basic principles of a technically successful procedure. The issue of whether the anterior sector (AS) of the right lobe (RL) graft should or should not be routinely drained has been controversial. The aim of this 10-year, single-center, retrospective cohort study was to review the evolution of our hepatic venous outflow reconstruction technique in RL grafts and evaluate the impact of routine AS drainage strategy on the outcome. The study group consisted of 582 primary RL LDLT performed between July 2004 and December 2014. The cases were divided into 3 consecutive periods with different AS venous outflow reconstruction techniques, which included middle hepatic vein (MHV) drainage in Era 1 (n=119), a more selective AS drainage with cryopreserved homologous grafts in Era 2 (n=391), and routine segment 5 and/or 8 oriented AS drainage with synthetic grafts in Era 3 (n=72). Intraoperative portal flow measurement with routine splenic artery ligation (SAL) technique (in RL grafts with a portal flow of ≥ 250 mL/min/100 g liver tissue) was added later in Era 3. These 3 groups were compared in terms of recipient and donor demographics, surgical characteristics and short-term outcome. The rate of AS venous drainage varied from 58.8% in Era 1 and 35.0% in Era 2 to 73.6% in Era 3 (P<0.001). Perioperative mortality rate of recipients significantly decreased over the years (15.1% in Era 1 and 8.7% in Era 2 vs. 2.8% in Era 3, P=0.01). After the addition of SAL technique in the 45 cases, there was only 1 graft loss and no perioperative mortality. One-year recipient survival rate was also significantly higher in Era 3 (79.6% in Era 1 and 86.1% in Era 2 vs. 92.1% in Era 3, P=0.002). Routine AS drainage via segment 5 and/or 8 veins using synthetic grafts is a technique to fit all RL grafts in LDLT. Addition of SAL effectively prevents early graft dysfunction and significantly improves the outcome.
在活体供肝肝移植(LDLT)中,充足的肝静脉流出道是技术成功手术的基本原则之一。右叶(RL)移植物的前扇区(AS)是否应常规引流一直存在争议。这项为期10年的单中心回顾性队列研究的目的是回顾我们在RL移植物中肝静脉流出道重建技术的演变,并评估常规AS引流策略对预后的影响。研究组包括2004年7月至2014年12月期间进行的582例原发性RL LDLT手术。这些病例被分为3个连续时期,采用不同的AS静脉流出道重建技术,其中第1阶段(n = 119)为肝中静脉(MHV)引流,第2阶段(n = 391)为采用冷冻保存的同种异体移植物进行更具选择性的AS引流,第3阶段(n = 72)为采用合成移植物进行常规的5段和/或8段定向AS引流。在第3阶段后期增加了采用常规脾动脉结扎(SAL)技术(在门静脉血流≥250 mL/min/100 g肝组织的RL移植物中)进行术中门静脉血流测量。比较了这3组在受者和供者人口统计学、手术特征及短期预后方面的情况。AS静脉引流率从第1阶段的58.8%、第2阶段的35.0%变化至第3阶段的73.6%(P<0.001)。多年来受者围手术期死亡率显著下降(第1阶段为15.1%,第2阶段为8.7%,第3阶段为2.8%,P = 0.01)。在45例病例中增加SAL技术后,仅1例移植物丢失,无围手术期死亡。第3阶段1年受者生存率也显著更高(第1阶段为79.6%,第2阶段为86.1%,第3阶段为92.1%,P = 0.002)。采用合成移植物通过5段和/或8段静脉进行常规AS引流是一种适用于LDLT中所有RL移植物的技术。增加SAL可有效预防早期移植物功能障碍并显著改善预后。