Divine Laura M, Kizer Nora T, Hagemann Andrea R, Pittman Meredith E, Chen Ling, Powell Matthew A, Mutch David G, Rader Janet S, Thaker Premal H
Washington University School of Medicine & Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Springfield Clinic, Springfield, IL, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, United States.
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Jul;142(1):76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.04.030. Epub 2016 May 8.
No standardized treatment strategies exist for patients with gynecologic malignancies complicated by brain metastases. Identification of poor outcome characteristics, long-term survival indicators, and molecular markers could help individualize and optimize treatment.
This retrospective cohort study included 100 gynecologic cancer patients with brain metastases treated at our institution between January 1990 and June 2009. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS) from time of diagnosis of brain metastases. We used univariate and multivariate analyses to evaluate associations between OS and clinical factors. We used immunohistochemistry to examine expression of five molecular markers in primary tumors and brain metastases in a subset of patients and matched controls. Statistical tests included the Student's paired t-test (for marker expression) and Kaplan-Meier test (for correlations).
On univariate analysis, primary ovarian disease, CA-125<81units/mL at brain metastases diagnosis, and isolated versus multi-focal metastases were all associated with longer survival. Isolated brain metastasis remained the only significant predictor on multivariate analysis (HR 2.66; CI 1.19-5.93; p=0.017). Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) was higher in metastatic brain samples than in primary tumors of controls (p<0.0001). None of the molecular markers were significantly associated with survival.
Multi-modality therapy may lead to improved clinical outcomes, and VEGF therapy should be investigated in treatment of brain metastases.
对于合并脑转移的妇科恶性肿瘤患者,目前尚无标准化的治疗策略。识别不良预后特征、长期生存指标和分子标志物有助于实现个体化治疗并优化治疗方案。
这项回顾性队列研究纳入了1990年1月至2009年6月期间在我院接受治疗的100例合并脑转移的妇科癌症患者。主要结局指标是从脑转移诊断时起的总生存期(OS)。我们采用单因素和多因素分析来评估OS与临床因素之间的关联。我们使用免疫组织化学方法检测了部分患者及其匹配对照的原发性肿瘤和脑转移灶中五种分子标志物的表达情况。统计检验包括学生配对t检验(用于标志物表达)和Kaplan-Meier检验(用于相关性分析)。
单因素分析显示,原发性卵巢疾病、脑转移诊断时CA-125<81单位/毫升以及孤立性转移与多灶性转移相比,均与更长的生存期相关。多因素分析中,孤立性脑转移仍然是唯一显著的预测因素(风险比2.66;可信区间1.19 - 5.93;p = 0.017)。转移性脑样本中血管内皮生长因子A(VEGF-A)的表达高于对照的原发性肿瘤(p < 0.0001)。没有一种分子标志物与生存期显著相关。
多模式治疗可能会改善临床结局,VEGF治疗在脑转移治疗中值得研究。