Thrul Johannes, Ferguson Stuart G, Bühler Anneke
a Postdoctoral Scholar, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education , University of California-San Francisco , San Francisco , CA , USA.
b Associate Professor, School of Medicine , University of Tasmania , Hobart , Australia.
J Psychoactive Drugs. 2016 Jul-Aug;48(3):153-8. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2016.1172744. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
Light and intermittent smoking has become a prevalent pattern of use among young adults. Little is known about which factors differentiate light and intermittent smokers (LITS) from heavy smokers (HS) in young adulthood. In this study, we compare young adult LITS with HS with regard to demographic- and smoking-related variables, self-control abilities, and concrete strategies of smoking restraint. The data were collected as part of an Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) study with 137 German young adult smokers (M Age = 21.1 years, 46.0% female; 76 HS [≥10 cigarettes/day] and 61 LITS [≤5 cigarettes/day]). Participants were recruited over the Internet and completed a baseline questionnaire online. Several variables differentiated LITS and HS in a multiple logistic regression analysis: LITS reported fewer smoking friends (p < .001) and a higher self-efficacy to resist smoking (p < .01). Further, LITS smoking status was associated with reporting a past quit attempt (p < .05) and the use of smoking restraint strategies (counting, limiting, and purposefully not smoking cigarettes; p < .05). Notably, nicotine dependence and trait self-control abilities did not differentiate between LITS and HS. Our results point to the role of smoking restraint strategies and self-monitoring of smoking to limit the daily number of cigarettes smoked.
轻度和间歇性吸烟已成为年轻人中普遍的吸烟模式。对于哪些因素能将年轻成年人中的轻度和间歇性吸烟者(LITS)与重度吸烟者(HS)区分开来,我们知之甚少。在本研究中,我们比较了年轻成年LITS与HS在人口统计学和吸烟相关变量、自我控制能力以及具体的戒烟策略方面的差异。这些数据是作为一项生态瞬时评估(EMA)研究的一部分收集的,该研究涉及137名德国年轻成年吸烟者(平均年龄 = 21.1岁,46.0%为女性;76名HS[每天≥10支香烟]和61名LITS[每天≤5支香烟])。参与者通过互联网招募,并在线完成了一份基线问卷。在多元逻辑回归分析中,有几个变量区分了LITS和HS:LITS报告称吸烟的朋友较少(p <.001),且抵抗吸烟的自我效能感较高(p <.01)。此外,LITS的吸烟状况与报告过去曾尝试戒烟(p <.05)以及使用戒烟策略(计数、限制和故意不吸烟;p <.05)有关。值得注意的是,尼古丁依赖和特质自我控制能力在LITS和HS之间并无差异。我们的研究结果表明了戒烟策略和对吸烟的自我监测在限制每日吸烟量方面的作用。