Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at El Paso, 500 West University Avenue, El Paso, TX 79968, USA.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2010 May;12(5):465-73. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntq025. Epub 2010 Mar 4.
Few studies have assessed differences between intermittent and light smokers, particularly among young adults. Exploring these differences promotes a systematic approach to research and treatment in low-level smokers. This study explored demographic, tobacco-related, and psychosocial predictors of intermittent nondaily smoking relative to light smoking among basic military training (BMT) recruits. The impact of smoking status on abstinence rates at follow-up was also assessed.
Participants were 5,603 U.S. Air Force BMT intermittent nondaily (n = 3,134) or light daily (n = 2,469) smoking recruits participating in a population-based group randomized trial targeting tobacco use prevention and cessation (Klesges et al., 2006, Efficacy of a tailored tobacco control program on long-term use in a population of U.S. military troops. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 295-306.). Participants completed baseline measures assessing demographics; tobacco use and history; and common social, attitudinal, and behavioral risk factors for tobacco use. Flights of recruits were randomly assigned to a tobacco use intervention or health education control intervention. At the 1-year follow-up, participants reported 7-day point prevalence and continuous abstinence.
Intermittent nondaily smoking relative to light daily smoking was associated with lesser perceived addiction, intermittent and daily use of smokeless tobacco, nonsmoking male and female heads of household, lesser likelihood of smoking while stressed or while bored, and higher likelihood of intentions to quit smoking. Intermittent smokers were significantly more likely than light daily smokers to report abstinence at follow-up.
Intermittent and daily light smokers differ on several tobacco-related and psychosocial variables. Attending to these factors in prevention and cessation programs may enhance abstinence in both groups.
很少有研究评估间歇性和轻度吸烟者之间的差异,尤其是在年轻成年人中。探讨这些差异有助于对低水平吸烟者进行系统的研究和治疗。本研究探讨了基础军事训练 (BMT) 新兵中,与轻度每日吸烟相比,间歇性非每日吸烟的人口统计学、与烟草相关的和心理社会预测因素。还评估了吸烟状况对随访时戒烟率的影响。
参与者为 5603 名美国空军 BMT 间歇性非每日(n = 3134)或轻度每日(n = 2469)吸烟新兵,他们参加了一项基于人群的小组随机试验,旨在针对烟草使用预防和戒烟(Klesges 等人,2006 年,针对美国军队人群的量身定制的烟草控制计划对长期使用的效果。咨询和临床心理学杂志,74,295-306.)。参与者完成了基线测量,评估了人口统计学;烟草使用和历史;以及常见的社会、态度和行为风险因素与烟草使用。新兵的航班被随机分配到烟草使用干预或健康教育对照组。在 1 年随访时,参与者报告了 7 天的点流行率和连续戒烟率。
与轻度每日吸烟相比,间歇性非每日吸烟与较少的感知成瘾、间歇性和每日使用无烟烟草、非吸烟的男女户主、在压力下或无聊时吸烟的可能性较小、以及更强烈的戒烟意愿有关。间歇性吸烟者在随访时报告戒烟的可能性明显高于轻度每日吸烟者。
间歇性和轻度每日吸烟者在几个与烟草相关的和心理社会变量上存在差异。在预防和戒烟计划中关注这些因素可能会增强两组的戒烟效果。