• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Facilitated Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in STEMI Patients: Does It Work in Asian Patients?

作者信息

Huang Wei-Chun, Chiang Cheng-Hung, Liu Chun-Peng

机构信息

Cardiovascular Medical Center, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung;; School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei;; Department of Physical Therapy, Fooyin University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

Cardiovascular Medical Center, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung;; School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei;

出版信息

Acta Cardiol Sin. 2014 Jul;30(4):292-7.

PMID:27122802
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4804991/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Facilitated Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in STEMI Patients: Does It Work in Asian Patients?ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的易化经皮冠状动脉介入治疗：在亚洲患者中是否有效？
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2014 Jul;30(4):292-7.
2
Randomized comparison of pre-hospital-initiated facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention versus primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction very early after symptom onset: the LIPSIA-STEMI trial (Leipzig immediate prehospital facilitated angioplasty in ST-segment myocardial infarction).症状发作后极早期行院前启动的辅助经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗治疗急性心肌梗死的随机比较：LIPSIA-STEMI 试验（莱比锡即刻院前辅助 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死血管成形术）
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jun;4(6):605-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.01.013.
3
Comparison of primary and facilitated percutaneous coronary interventions for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: quantitative review of randomised trials.ST段抬高型心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与易化经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较：随机试验的定量综述
Lancet. 2006 Feb 18;367(9510):579-88. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68148-8.
4
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention compared with primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction transferred from community hospitals.与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗相比，在从社区医院转诊的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中，实施辅助经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的有效性和成本效益。
Clin Ther. 2006 Jul;28(7):1054-62. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.07.007.
5
Transfer travel times for primary percutaneous coronary intervention from low-volume and non-percutaneous coronary intervention-capable hospitals to high-volume centers in Florida.将佛罗里达州低容量和无经皮冠状动脉介入治疗能力的医院的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的转移就诊时间转移至高容量中心。
Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Sep;58(3):257-66. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.02.022. Epub 2011 Apr 19.
6
The impact of emergency physician-initiated primary percutaneous coronary intervention on mean door-to-balloon time in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction.急诊医生启动的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者平均门球时间的影响。
Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Nov;50(5):527-34. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.03.018. Epub 2007 Jun 20.
7
Direct paramedic transport of acute myocardial infarction patients to percutaneous coronary intervention centers: a decision analysis.急性心肌梗死患者直接由护理人员转运至经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中心：一项决策分析
Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Feb;53(2):233-240. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.07.020. Epub 2008 Sep 18.
8
Direct Transfer From the Referring Hospitals to the Catheterization Laboratory to Minimize Reperfusion Delays for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.从转诊医院直接转运至导管室以尽量减少直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的再灌注延迟：来自国家心血管数据注册库的见解
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Sep;8(9):e002477. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002477.
9
Outcomes of STEMI patients with chronic kidney disease treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: the Malaysian National Cardiovascular Disease Database - Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (NCVD-PCI) registry data from 2007 to 2014.接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的慢性肾脏病ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的预后：马来西亚国家心血管疾病数据库——2007年至2014年经皮冠状动脉介入治疗（NCVD-PCI）注册数据。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 Sep 24;18(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0919-9.
10
Comparison of outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention among different coronary subsets (stable and unstable angina pectoris and ST-segment and non-ST-segment myocardial infarction).比较不同冠状动脉亚组（稳定性和不稳定性心绞痛以及 ST 段和非 ST 段心肌梗死）经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的结局。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Jun 1;113(11):1794-801. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.03.007. Epub 2014 Mar 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Thrombolysis Followed by Early Percutaneous Coronary Intervention via Transradial Artery Approach in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者经桡动脉途径行早期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后进行溶栓治疗
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2014 Jul;30(4):284-91.
2
Outcome up to one year following different reperfusion strategies in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the Helsinki-Uusimaa Hospital District registry of ST-Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction (HUS-STEMI).不同再灌注策略对急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者 1 年预后的影响：赫尔辛基-乌西玛地区 ST 段抬高型急性心肌梗死登记研究（HUS-STEMI）。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2013 Dec;2(4):371-8. doi: 10.1177/2048872613501985. Epub 2013 Aug 21.
3
Clinical outcomes and cost implications of routine early PCI after fibrinolysis: one-year follow-up of the Trial of Routine Angioplasty and Stenting after Fibrinolysis to Enhance Reperfusion in Acute Myocardial Infarction (TRANSFER-AMI) study.溶栓后常规早期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的临床转归和成本影响：急性心肌梗死溶栓后常规血管成形术和支架置入术以改善再灌注（TRANSFER-AMI）研究的一年随访结果。
Am Heart J. 2013 Apr;165(4):630-637.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.12.016. Epub 2013 Feb 19.
4
Randomized comparison of pre-hospital-initiated facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention versus primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction very early after symptom onset: the LIPSIA-STEMI trial (Leipzig immediate prehospital facilitated angioplasty in ST-segment myocardial infarction).症状发作后极早期行院前启动的辅助经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗治疗急性心肌梗死的随机比较：LIPSIA-STEMI 试验（莱比锡即刻院前辅助 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死血管成形术）
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jun;4(6):605-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.01.013.
5
Timing of events in STEMI patients treated with immediate PCI or standard medical therapy: implications on optimisation of timing of treatment from the CARESS-in-AMI trial.STEMI 患者行直接 PCI 或标准药物治疗的时间进程：CARESS-in-AMI 试验对优化治疗时间的启示。
Int J Cardiol. 2012 Feb 9;154(3):275-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.09.042. Epub 2010 Oct 20.
6
Benefit of facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention in high-risk ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients presenting to nonpercutaneous coronary intervention hospitals.易化经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在高危 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者转至非经皮冠状动脉介入治疗医院中的获益。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Oct;2(10):917-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.06.018.
7
Facilitated angioplasty with combo therapy among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者联合治疗辅助血管成形术：随机试验的荟萃分析
Am J Emerg Med. 2009 Jul;27(6):683-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.05.021.
8
Efficacy and safety of immediate angioplasty versus ischemia-guided management after thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction in areas with very long transfer distances results of the NORDISTEMI (NORwegian study on DIstrict treatment of ST-elevation myocardial infarction).溶栓后直接行血管成形术与缺血指导管理对长距离转运地区急性心肌梗死的疗效和安全性：NORDISTEMI 研究（挪威 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死区域性治疗研究）结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jan 12;55(2):102-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.08.007. Epub 2009 Sep 10.
9
Routine early angioplasty after fibrinolysis for acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死溶栓治疗后的常规早期血管成形术。
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jun 25;360(26):2705-18. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0808276.
10
Multicenter randomized trial of facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention with low-dose tenecteplase in patients with acute myocardial infarction: the Athens PCI trial.急性心肌梗死患者应用低剂量替奈普酶辅助经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的多中心随机试验：雅典PCI试验
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Sep 1;74(3):398-405. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22009.